Skip to content Skip to left sidebar Skip to footer

Local News

HMHS Boys Basketball: Dawgs start with a split

By Lauree Padgett / Exclusive to Haddonfield.Today

After a pair of games played after Christmas as part of the Haddons Invitational, the Dawgs had a 6-day break until after 2025 checked in. I’ll have a more in-depth write-up of their Colonial Conference game played at home on Jan. 3 and a brief recap of their nonleague game the next day versus BCIT (Burlington County Institute of Technology)–Westampton.

January 3, 2025: West Deptford at Haddonfield

The Eagles are part of the Liberty division of the Colonial Conference, as are the Dawgs. I was expecting to watch the game in person, but due to an unexpected Christmas “gift,” aka COVID, I was instead sitting at my desk at home, waiting for the HUDL feed to begin. (If you haven’t registered—it’s free—for HUDL, check out the Haddonfield page, HERE. You don’t have to download anything: The box at the top of the page that says “Download” is an ad that you should ignore. Just choose the game and click the arrow to start. Any home game, and some away games, you can view the Dawgs’ play live or after the fact.)

Just when I was getting a bit fidgety because I’d gotten a message indicating there was either a delay to the start of the game or technical issues (it was the former), the stream began. I thought being at my home with the play-by-play right in front of me and my scorepad and notebook on the desk (instead of balanced precariously on my lap) would make this game a little easier to record. I wasn’t counting on the breakneck speed of the action or the points being put on the board, mostly by the Dawgs. I nearly got whiplash trying to keep up.

Early on in the season, the starting lineup for the Dawgs has remained constant: forwards Chris Beane (junior) and Ryan Guveiyian (sophomore) and guards Jake Dewedoff (senior) and juniors Chase Stadler and Mike Douglas. Douglas does the jump-ball to start the game, and although the Dawgs got the tip, their first shot attempt did not go in. Good “D” by Beane and Guveiyian led to a steal and a bucket by Beane. A steal by Stadler resulted in 2 by Douglas, giving the Dawgs a 4–0 lead at the 6:45 mark.

The Eagles got a basket to make it 4–2, Haddonfield, and Guveiyian pulled down an offensive board and scored, putting the Dawgs back on top by 4, 6–2, with 6:23 on the clock. Then the Dawgs were off to the races. Although there were some missed shots on their end, Haddonfield would score the next 7 points on a 3 by Stadler, a steal and a basket by Beane, and a basket by Douglas after two offensive rebounds. West Deptford managed to get another 2 with 4:52 left in the quarter to make it 13–4, Haddonfield and after the Dawgs didn’t score for a few possessions, the Eagles got a bucket at the 4:01 mark, making it a 7-point, 13–6 Dawg advantage. And then the Dawgs really went off to the races. (And my neck started hurting.)

Beane nailed a 3 on a pass from Douglas. Another Stadler steal set up a trey from Dewedoff. After a drive in the paint by Douglas, the Dawgs were up by 18, and there was still about 2:45 left in the quarter. Douglas followed that up with a 3 on a feed from Guveiyian. Dewedoff would get the next two buckets, the first on a nice floater, and the next, a drive in the paint, would put the Dawgs up by 26, 31–6, with a minute and change to go.

A steal by Douglas (the Eagles really had a rough time, especially in the first 8 minutes, handling the Dawgs’ pressure defense) made it 33–6, with 53 seconds on the clock. West Deptford got its 4th basket and 8th point of the game before Dewedoff drained another 3 off a pass from Guveiyian, and the quarter ended with the Dawgs really giving it to the Eagles, up by almost 30 points, 36–8.

To the credit of both the players and the West Deptford coaching staff, the Eagles did not come out to begin the second quarter with their wings beneath their legs. Instead, it was quite the opposite. After the Dawgs turned the ball over after inbounding it to begin the quarter, the Eagles turned the tables and scored 9 straight points with a trio of 2’s and one trey. In less than 2 minutes, they had cut their deficit to 36–17. I don’t think this was because the Dawgs came out in the second cocky. I suspect that perhaps they eased up on the throttle a bit, but that’s not taking any credit away from the Eagles’ refusing to give up.

Beane’s trey broke the Dawgs’ dry spell, and Stadler followed with his second 3 of the game off a pass from Douglas. After good D under the Eagles’ basket, Dewedoff drove 2, and the Dawgs had put their lead back up to 27, 44–17, with 3:25 left in the half. After a West Deptford timeout, the Eagles hit a 3. After Stadler got a 2, Guveiyian took an offensive charge at one end and went up and in at the other to make it 48–20, Dawgs, with 2:32 on the clock.

The Eagles hit another 3, Dewedoff made 1–2 from the foul line, and after another Dawgs’ steal, Stadler’s bucket put the Dawgs over the 50-point mark, 51–23, with just under 2 minutes until the half. The Eagles seemed to have better luck beyond the 3-point arc, notching another trey, and the Dawgs would finish out the half on steal and 2 points from junior John Scipione, putting the Dawgs up by 27, 53–26, as the teams headed off the court. It’s worth noting that the run by West Deptford to begin the second enabled them to outscore the Dawgs in the second 8 minutes by 1 point, 18–17.

After pounding 53 points into the net in the first half of the game, the Dawgs would “only” muster 49 in the second half, to the Eagles’ 22. Coach Wiedeman, as he’s done most games so far this season, put junior Mike Mooney in the second quarter along with John Scipione. Scipione also saw some action in the third, but it was the five starters who did all the scoring. In the third, Douglas got one more 3 and a pair of 2’s to total 21 points. Beane matched his first half 10 points by putting up 10 more in the third. Dewedoff, who knocked in 13 in the first half, added 4 more in the third. Stadler drove in 10 in the first half and added a 3 in the third. He, Bean, and Douglas each had a trio of treys in the game, and the Dawgs drained 13 altogether. In the third, Guveiyian added two from the foul line to finish with 6. As the third period buzzer sounded, the Dawgs were cruising, up by 44, 79–35.

That is why in the fourth quarter, the starters sat on the bench and cheered on their teammates, who showed the Dawg fans they could put up some points as well. Mooney got the offense going with a 3. Sophomore Bill Raus made it 84–35, before the Eagles hit from beyond the arc, making it 84–38.

Adding to those last 23 points were John Scipione, with a pair of buckets and a foul shot, and his twin Nick, who drained a 3. Freshman Ethan Miller drove in the paint for a pair of baskets, Raus would get another basket, and junior Griffin Breen also scored two baskets. The second Breen bucket, which netted the Dawgs point 102, came off a feed from junior Jude McFillin, and on my notepad, scribbled that Jude’s feed looked very much like those I was used to seeing last season from his bro Phil. While I’m talking about brothers, I want to apologize for an oversight from last week. I should have noted that Chris Beane’s brother Sean also was a senior on the 2021–2022 squad with Matt Guveiyian and Tom Mooney, older sibs of Ryan and Mike.

With all this offensive output—11 Dawgs scored 3 points or more—it’s not too surprising that Dawgs ended up defeating the Eagles by 54 points, besting them and then some, 102–48.

Quarter scores:

1st: Haddonfield, 36, West Deptford, 8

2nd: Haddonfield, 17, West Deptford, 18

Halftime: Haddonfield, 53, West Deptford, 26

3rd: Haddonfield, 26, West Deptford, 9

4th:  Haddonfield, 23, West Deptford, 13

Final: Haddonfield, 102, West Deptford, 48

Player scores:

Mike Douglas: 21

Chris Beane: 20

Jake Dewedoff: 17

Chase Stadler: 13

John Scipione: 7

Ryan Guveiyian: 6

Griffin Breen: 4

Ethan Miller: 4

Ben Raus: 4

Mike Mooney: 3

Nick Scipione: 3

January 4, 2025: Haddonfield at BCIT–Westampton

I may not have gotten to this game even if I hadn’t been following COVID protocol. And since BCIT belongs to the NFHS network, which is a paid subscription streaming service, I had to rely on my travel buddy, who did make the trip, as well as another courtside reporter for the little information I have on this game. (If you want a bit more info about the game, including player stats, and have a paid subscription to NJ.com, you can go HERE.

Historically, Haddonfield boys teams do not fare well when playing morning games. That this contest followed a night game in which there was a high-end production of points probably did not help. Here’s what I can “pass” along about the game.

My travel buddy texted after the first quarter that the Dawgs were down 7–10 and were 0–8 from behind the arc. “They are BIG,” I was informed.

My courtside reporter had this to say: “The biggest thing that struck me was a slow start by our team and a lot of missed shots early in the game. Our shooting kind of went cold but even with not being able to hit a three and a bunch of missed layups, we were still only down by a couple at halftime.” (The score was 18–22.)

By the end of the 3rd, the Dawgs were trailing by 5, 29–35. My travel buddy sent this short update in the 4th: “It’s getting away now,” with BCIT up by double-digits, 48–36. The next text I got I figured would be the final score, but instead, I was told: “Wait … 49–54. 1:00 left.” Of course, then I was hoping the Dawgs would pull off one of their final-minute heroics only to get one last text: “Nope. It’s over now. 49–61 final.”

My courtside reporter elaborated more on the last 8 minutes of the game. “[The] team played really well in the fourth, but the other team was big, and it just didn’t work in our favor, as they made their free throws down the stretch when we started fouling them on purpose.” [The game] was closer than the score shows given this.”

When I asked if the timing of the previous game had any impact, I got this reply: “I do think the quick back-to-back scheduled worked against us.”

The Dawgs are now 5–2 overall, 2–0 in conference play.

The Week Ahead

There is a scheduled home game Monday, 1/6 at 7:00 versus Audubon, however, Mother Nature’s dropping of snow is likely to cause a postponement. Whenever you are in doubt or just want to get an updated schedule, the best place to go is to the boys basketball page of the high school website. Here is the direct LINK:

The boys also are scheduled to have a home game on Wednesday, 1/8 against Sterling, also at  7:00. Saturday is a road trip to Delsea for a 1 p.m. game. If you get signed up for HUDL, you can stream this game live or at your leisure.

HMHS Boys Basketball: New squad gets off to a promising start

By Lauree Padgett / Exclusive to Haddonfield.Today

Last year, the boys basketball team was loaded with seniors. Their numbers totaled eight and seven of them either started or saw significant playing time most games. The fact that they had all played together since youth basketball helped them lead the Dawgs to a 27–3 overall record, as well as a 15­–0 record in the Colonial Conference (12–0 in the Liberty Division).

This is not the case for what has so far been this season’s starting lineup. It touts one senior, Jake Dewedoff, the sole 12th grader on the squad, who got into the end of a few varsity games last year, as did junior Chase Stadler. Junior Chris Beane and sophomore Ryan Guveiyian saw a bit more action last year, but neither was ever on the court at the game’s tipoff. Only junior Mike Douglas saw significant playing time, often being one of the first players Paul Wiedeman, now in his 26th season as head coach, brought in off the bench.

Another difference is the height of this year’s team. Last year, Zach Langan and Patrick Ryan were listed as 6-4, with Nate Rohlfing having 4 inches on them, at 6-8. This year, the tallest players are 6-3 and include Douglas and junior Mike Mooney. (Speaking of Mooney, it’s worth noting that his older brother Tom and Guveiyian’s older brother Matthew were teammates on the 2021–22 squad.)

After five games in the young season, this lack of experience or height has not come into play, so to speak. Here is a brief recap of these first games, all played before the calendar turned to 2025.

December 17, 2024: Willingboro at Haddonfield

The first half of this game versus the athletic-looking Chimeras made it look as if all four quarters would be close. Both teams started out a little tight, and it wasn’t until just under the 5-minute mark that either team scored. Jake Dewedoff got the Dawgs on the board with a drive under the basket. A few plays later, Willingboro got 1 off the foul line. After a few more trips up and down the court, a steal by Stadler led to 2 from Guveiyian, whose foul shot made it a 5–1 game at the 2:09 mark.

A 3 got the Chimeras to within 1, 5­–4 with just less than 2 minutes left in the quarter. Guveiyian’s bucket made it 7–4 with 1:05 on the clock, but the Chimeras answered with their own 2 and with 43 seconds left, it was 7–6, Dawgs. Douglas sank two from the foul line, but another Willingboro basket with about 19 seconds left made it a 1-point, 9–8, game, and that’s how the quarter ended.

It stayed tight in the second quarter, with the Dawgs maintaining a 2- to 3-point advantage through the first 4 minutes with a pair of foul shots by Guveiyian and a steal and a basket by junior John Scipione. In the last 4 minutes, Willingboro hit a 2 and a 3 between a foul shot by John Scipione (he’s got a twin brother, Nick, so I’ll always be ID’ing them using first and last names!) to go up by 1, 14–13, with 1:09 to go. However, after a bad pass gave Willingboro the ball with :9.5 on the clock, John Scipione stole the ball and fed it to Stadler, who nailed a 3 to give the Dawgs a 17–15 edge going into the locker rooms.

The Dawgs started to pull away a bit toward the end of the 3rd quarter. However, not before the Chimeras had gotten to within 2, 24–22, at the 4:33 mark after having three chances to score in one possession. A 3 by Mooney was followed by what I can only describe as a “bounce” 3 by Willingboro (the ball hit the rim and bounced in instead of out) to keep it a 2-point, 27–25 game, but Guveiyian scored off an inbound pass, and a few plays later, his feed to Beane made it 31–25, Dawgs with 1:36 on the clock.

A steal by Douglas led to a 2 by John Scipione, and the next possession, Douglas hit 2 from the foul line to put Haddonfield up by 10, but a 2 on the buzzer kept Willingboro within 8, 35–27.

The Dawgs outscored the Chimeras 13–5 in the last 8 minutes of the game to notch their first win by 16, 48–32. Guveiyian was the only Dawg in double digits, finishing with 14 points.

Quarter scores:

1st: Haddonfield 9, Willingboro, 8

2nd: Haddonfield 8, Willingboro, 7

Halftime: Haddonfield 17, Willingboro, 15

3rd: Haddonfield 18, Willingboro, 12

4th: Haddonfield 13, Willingboro, 7

Final: Haddonfield 48, Willingboro, 32

Player scores:

Ryan Guveiyian: 14

Mike Douglas: 9

John Scipione: 7

Mike Mooney: 6

Chris Beane: 4

Jake Dewedoff: 4

Chase Stadler: 4

December 19, 2024: Haddonfield at Paulsboro

My travel buddy and I agree that a game played at the Red Raider’s court can never be considered an easy 32 minutes. And this early in the season, it was hard to know what to expect.

The Raiders stole the ball right after the Dawgs had gained possession from the tipoff and scored the first bucket of the game. That wasn’t the greatest of starts, but after Mike Douglas’ bucket tied the game, a pair of treys by Chase Stadler and Jake Dewedoff put the Dawgs on top 8–2 with about 4:14 left in the quarter. Paulsboro got a 3 in its next possession, but Chris Beane answered at the other end to make it 11–5, Dawgs with 3:51 on the clock.

After a timeout by Paulsboro, the Raiders knocked down another 3, to cut the deficit to 3, 11–8. Dewedoff’s layup was followed by a missed Raiders’ shot and a defensive board by Guveiyian, who scored at the other end after a non-shooting foul by Paulsboro. That made it 15–8 with 1:47 on the clock. Paulsboro hit its third trey of the quarter to get to within 4, 15–11, with 47 seconds showing on the scoreboard. Douglas finished off the scoring of the quarter with a 2 and as the buzzer sounded, the Dawgs were up 17–11.

After Paulsboro got the first points of the 2nd quarter on the foul line, the Dawgs responded with 7 unanswered points. Douglas’ 2 from the line made it 19–13, and Paulsboro turned the ball over almost immediately, stepping out of bounds. (There was an unusually high number of turnovers as players from both sides had trouble staying within court boundaries throughout the game.) Douglas got 2 more, this time from the field. The Raiders again stepped out of bounds and paid the price when John Scipione notched a 3, giving the Dawgs a double-digit, 24–13 lead with only 2 minutes gone. Maybe this wasn’t going to be too tough a game after all …

Of course, that wasn’t the case, as Paulsboro went on its own mini-run, getting the next 6 points of the game and closing the gap to 24–19 with 2:29 left in the half. John Scipione kept it from getting any closer with a steal and a nice hesitation move under the basket to break the Dawgs’ scoreless run, but Paulsboro nailed another 3 and with about 1:30 to go, the Raiders were within 4, 26–24. After turning the ball over, the Dawgs got it back on a steal from Douglas, who went all the way with a basket, giving Haddonfield a 28–22 edge with just under a minute left.

Paulsboro hit yet another 3, Haddonfield turned the ball over again, and Paulsboro got to the foul line with 9.7 seconds to go. Both shots were good, and when the halftime buzzer sounded, the Dawgs were only up by 2, 28–26.

Douglas contributed to the first 4 points of the second half, dishing the ball to Chris Beane and then pilfering the ball and making a great move under the basket to score himself. That made it 32–25 with about 90 second gone in the 3rd quarter. Paulsboro got the next 4 points from field goals, so with about 4:20 left in the quarter, it was back to a 2-point Haddonfield edge, 32–30. A hard drive by Beane pushed it back to a 4-point advantage. However, the Raiders were raining 3’s and the one at the 4:10 mark got them back to within 1, 34–33.

Stadler hit his second trey of the game, Paulsboro traveled but got the ball right back with a steal and scored, and with 3:25 showing on the clock, it was a 2-point, 37–35, Dawgs’ lead. Haddonfield went on a mini run again, with Dewedoff scoring in between a pair from Guveiyian, with Guveiyian’s second coming on a nice bit of passing with John Scipione starting if off and Douglas getting the assist. That made it 43–35 and with :40.3 remaining in the half, Paulsboro called a timeout.

The Raiders got 2 points back from the foul line, but Dewedoff launched a 3 ahead of the buzzer, and going into the last 8 minutes, the Dawgs were up by 9 46–37.

Paulsboro got the first two buckets of the 4th, a 2 and a 3, and it was back to a 4-point game,  46–42, with less than 90 seconds gone. Dewedoff’s 3 made it 49–42. The Raiders answered, but Douglas went in for 2 at the other end, and with about 5 minutes left in the game, Haddonfield had a little more breathing room, up by 7, 51–44. Beane had a nice drive into the paint, increasing that lead to 9, 53–44, with 4:11 on the clock.

Neither team scored for a few trips up and down the court before Douglas made it 55–44 with 2:33 left in the game. A pickoff and bucket by Beane gave the Dawgs their biggest lead of the game, 57–44, with 2 and change left. Douglas got his second basket of the quarter off an inbound pass after Paulsboro lost the ball out of bounds. Paulsboro hit one more 3 before time ran out, but it didn’t matter. The Dawgs had prevailed 59–46 and survived another game in Red Raiders’ territory.

Mike Douglas knocked in 16 points, and Jake Dewedoff had 13. All starters scored.

Quarter scores:

1st: Haddonfield, 17, Paulsboro, 11

2nd: Haddonfield, 11, Paulsboro, 15 

Halftime: Haddonfield, 28, Paulsboro, 26

3rd: Haddonfield, 18, Paulsboro, 11

4th: Haddonfield, 13, Paulsboro, 9

Final: Haddonfield 59, Paulsboro, 46

Player scores:

Mike Douglas: 16

Jake Dewedoff: 13

Chase Stadler: 9

Chris Beane: 8

Ryan Guveiyian: 6

John Scipione: 5

Mike Mooney: 2

December 21, 2024: Haddonfield vs. Lenape at Cherokee (Coaches vs. Cancer tournament)

After the win at Paulsboro, Coach Wiedeman said the next game was going to be a tough one. He was right. The Dawgs managed to stay in the game in the 1st, but were trailing by 4, 9–13. After 2 quarters, Lenape was up by 10. By the end of the 3rd, Lenape was cruising, up 19, 41–22. Haddonfield outscored Lenape by 3, 16–13, in the last 8 minutes, but it did not change the outcome of the game, and when the final buzzer sounded, Lenape had handed Haddonfield its first loss, winning by 14, 54–40. The bright spots of the game were Chris Beane’s second half scoring, in which he got 12 out of his 14 game-leading points. We also so the debut of freshman Ethan Miller (who may be taller than 6-3, but since he wasn’t on the original varsity roster, I don’t have an official height for him yet).

December 27, 2024: Haddons Invitational—Pemberton Township vs. Haddonfield

The Hornets had four senior starters and looked like another athletic team out on the court during warmups. And they definitely had some inches over the Dawgs’ starters. But they did not know how to handle the Dawgs’ stellar (as always) defense. That in part led to the Dawgs 9–0 run at the game’s outset. Mike Douglas started it off with a 3, Ryan Guveiyian’s steal led to a 2 by Douglas, another pickoff by Guveiyian put the ball in the hands of Chris Beane, who went up and in, and Guveiyian would get the last 2 points from the foul line. The Hornets finally scored at the 5:19 mark, so it was it 9–2, Dawgs.

After Douglas’ third basket of the game, off a nice double clutch move in the paint, Pemberton Township scored its second, and last, basket of the quarter, making it 11­–4 with 4:01 on the clock. The Dawgs got the last 7 points on a pair of 2-point field goals by Beane, a pretty maneuver under the basket by John Scipione, and one from the line by Guveiyian. This put the Dawgs up 18–4 going into the second quarter.

Although the Dawgs got 21 points in the second, the Hornets found their groove and started avoiding the pressure defense and making some shots. They actually outscored the Dawgs by 1, 22–21, but were still down by 13 going into the half. Beane provided 9 of the Dawgs’ 2nd quarter points, helping to keep the Hornets from stinging too much.

In the second half, the Dawgs found ways to stifle the Hornets again. In the 3rd, Pemberton only got 8 points on the board to Haddonfield’s 16. This time it was Mike Mooney’s trio of treys that kept the Hornets at bay. Going into the last 8 minutes, the Dawgs were up by 21, 55–34. The 4th quarter was more of the same. The Dawgs added 15 more points, holding the Hornets to 10. When the final horn went off, the Dawgs had won handily, 70–44. I made a note in my scorebook that by the end of the 3rd, the Dawgs had already put up 11 more points—55—than the Hornets would garner in 4.

The Dawgs had some nice balance in their scoring, with three starters hitting double digits. Chris Beane finished with 19, Mike Douglas had 14, and Ryan Guveiyian had 12.

Quarter scores:

1st: Haddonfield, 18, Pemberton Township, 4

2nd: Haddonfield, 21, Pemberton Township, 22

Halftime: Haddonfield, 55, Pemberton Township, 34

3rd: Haddonfield, 16, Pemberton Township, 8

4th: Haddonfield, ,15 Pemberton Township, 10

Final score: Haddonfield, 70, Pemberton Township, 44

Player scores:

Chris Beane: 19

Mike Douglas: 14

Ryan Guveiyian: 12

Mike Mooney: 9

Jake Dewedoff: 8

Ben Raus: 3

John Scipione: 2

Van Lefakis: 2

Jude McFillin: 1

December 28, 2024: Haddons Invitational—Clearview Regional vs. Haddonfield

The Clearview Pioneers looked, yes, big and athletic during warmups the next afternoon. And four of their five starters were seniors. And once again, it did not matter. In that always important first quarter, the Pioneers could not handle the Dawgs defensively and could not do much to stop them offensively either. Although the first 4 minutes of the game were fairly competitive, with the Pioneers actually going up 4–3 at the 6:38 mark, they wouldn’t score again for more than 2 minutes, and that would be their last bucket of the quarter. Meanwhile for the Dawgs, Chris Beane and Mike Douglas led the way in those first 8 minutes. Beane scored 8 points on four 2-point field goals. Douglas had four buckets as well, one of them a 3-pointer. When the quarter was done, the Dawgs were up 26–6.

The Pioneers did tally more points on the board in the second, putting up 17 to the Dawgs’ 21. For Haddonfield, Beane continued to shine, this time from the foul line, knocking in 7 points, one after a bucket. Speaking of the foul line, Haddonfield only missed one shot, going 9 of 10 the whole game. At halftime, the Dawgs were up 44–23.

The third quarter was the tightest of the 8-minute periods. Although the Dawgs put 20 on the board, the Pioneers got 19. The Dawgs made a string of questionable shots (mostly from beyond the 3-point arc) that did not drop, which had the score been closer at the half, could have caused some serious trouble. The Pioneers also were able to outsmart the Dawgs’ defense a bit more in the 3rd, even though the team was still trailing by 22 points, 64–22, at the end of the quarter.

In the 4th, Clearview outscored Haddonfield by 3, in part because Coach Wiedeman cleared the bench, but even so, the Dawgs still came out on top with another double-digit victory, winning by 19, 78–59. Chris Beane and Mike Douglas both topped 20, with Beane notching 26 and Douglas scoring 23. Ryan Guveiyian also hit double figures with 16.

Quarter scores:

1st: Haddonfield, 26, Clearview Regional, 6

2nd: Haddonfield, 18, Clearview Regional, 14

Halftime: Haddonfield, 44, Clearview Regional, 23

3rd: Haddonfield, 20, Clearview Regional, 19

4th: Haddonfield, 14, Clearview Regional, 17

Final: Haddonfield, 78, Clearview Regional, 59

Player scores:

Chris Beane: 26

Mike Douglas: 23

Ryan Guveiyian: 16

Ethan Miller: 6

Jake Dewedoff: 4

John Scipione: 3

Next Up:

Haddonfield will have two games after the New Year begins. First is a home Colonial Conference game on Friday, 1/3, at 7 versus Audubon. The next day is an away game at 11:30 a.m. versus BCIT Westampton

Bancroft: Q&A on Woodmont Properties

On May 13, 2024, the Board of Commissioners designated Woodmont Properties of Fairfield NJ as the conditional redeveloper for 8.2 acres on the east (Cherry Hill) side of Hopkins Lane, commonly known as “Bancroft.”

The Borough intended that a charet in the Borough Hall on June 17 would provide residents and others with an opportunity to learn, directly from representatives of Woodmont, about their proposal. The information meeting was less than successful, for a variety of reasons. We therefore thought it might be helpful, especially for those who did not attend on June 17, to pose some questions to Woodmont Properties. 

Q1. Rent

If the Bancroft development were in place today, what would be the likely range of monthly rents for 2-bedroom and 1-bedroom units? 

ANSWER: Our estimate is that today’s monthly rents for the market-rate apartment flats would range from the high $2,000s for a 1-bedroom unit, to the high $3,000s for the largest 2-bedroom units. Monthly rent, after payment of the one-time amenity fee, allows every resident the use of the clubhouse facility and other amenities.

Q2. Affordable Units

Will all the affordable units be 3-bedroom units? Will there be any 3-bedroom units that are not affordable units? If so, what would be the likely range of monthly rents for those units, if the Bancroft development were in place today?

ANSWER: There are 18 affordable units to apply toward Haddonfield’s unmet affordable housing obligation. This obligation, and the unit mix for the affordable units, are proscribed by affordable housing regulations. Here, this yields 14 two-bedroom units and 4 three-bedroom units. There will be no market rate 3-bedroom units.

Q3. Rent vs Purchase

Some downsizing seniors have said they would be more interested in purchasing a unit than in renting one. Do any of your other properties offer a purchase option? Regardless, would you consider designating some of the Bancroft units – probably the 2-bedroom ones only – for purchase? And would you consider designating some or all of those units as age-restricted (55+)?  

ANSWER: There is no for-sale component of this project. The rental apartments will offer a highly amenitized, more flexible, maintenance-free alternative to home ownership, which, in our experience, would be in high demand in Haddonfield and is so in other towns across the state. We believe this will hold particular appeal for seniors who are looking to downsize and free themselves of the headaches and costs of home maintenance and repairs. 

Indeed, while the community will not be age-restricted, we anticipate based on the dynamics of this location, as well as on our experience with other similar communities that we have developed in NJ, that a large proportion of our residents will be 55+.

Q4. Universal Design

Will you commit to ensuring that the Bancroft development is barrier-free and fully accessible to those in wheelchairs? For example: Continuous, no-step paths from streets to elevators, no-step showers in all bathrooms, and grab-bars in all bathrooms from the outset?

ANSWER: Our communities are designed with accessibility in mind and constructed in accordance with the NJ and Federal ADA Accessibility code. Residences are designed to be ADA accessible for all elevator-serviced buildings. 

With only a few exceptions in a handful of larger units with loft areas, units will offer one-floor living and all units will provide ample square footage for spacious bedrooms and other living spaces. All ADA-accessible routes will feature doorways wide enough to permit wheelchairs. Blocking for grab bars is installed in all units as part of the adaptability requirement. If a shower is used to meet the adaptable ADA residence requirement, it will be a roll-in shower.

Q5. Historic Buildings

What use do you propose for the historic building at the east edge of the property (known during its Bancroft days as “The Hospital”)? 

ANSWER: Haddonfield and this property are rich in history, and we are excited to integrate the historic structures into our project as unique amenity spaces. We have experience in reviving, and integrating into our communities, historic structures and will do the same here. 

We are evaluating potential uses and will be able to share more once the details around the community are more formalized. The rehabilitation of these buildings will be undertaken in a manner to preserve their historic character and ensure that they can be enjoyed for generations to come.

Q6. Community Input

Would you consider convening a Community Advisory Group, composed of Haddonfield residents and other interested parties, to provide you with comments, suggestions, recommendations, and feedback at various points as you develop detailed plans for the project? 

ANSWER: Our goal in every redevelopment project is to solicit and receive community input. How that takes place and in what form will be a conversation with the Borough Commissioners. We started the process on June 17 with a well-attended community charet at Borough Hall. Of course, the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Board will be heavily involved along the way.

Q7. Historic Commission Approvals

Are you aware that the Haddonfield Historic Preservation Commission, which must review your plans and provide a recommendation to the Planning Board, has a reputation for being extremely vigilant in ensuring that applications comply fully with the requirements of the Historic District Ordinance and that failures to comply can result in significant extensions to the timeline for projects under consideration?

ANSWER: Yes, we are aware and look forward to interacting with the Commission.Fortunately, Woodmont has been part of several historical redevelopments and appreciates the process on both the local and state level. Don’t forget, the State Historic Preservation Office – a division of NJ DEP – will have a say here too.

Q8. School-Age Children

On page 27 of your proposal you state, with respect to the number of school-age children residing in the project: “This will be addressed in a Fiscal Impact Study as discussed in Section F.” However, you do not address that matter in Section F, on page 29. How many school-age children do you expect this project to generate? What is the basis for your calculation?

ANSWER: Remember, under the Redevelopment Plan all market-rate homes will be only one and two bedrooms. The only three-bedroom homes on the site will be four affordable homes as required by state regulations (at least 20% of the affordable homes must be three- bedroom). 

Using fresh data from Woodmont communities in Hopewell and West Windsor – two excellent school districts – we expect 24 to 25 school-age children. Of that approximately 15 to 17 will come out of the 18 affordable homes, and the balance will come from the market-rate apartment homes. 

Using data from the Rutgers University Center for Real Estate White Paper titled School-Age Children in Rental Units in New Jersey: Results from a Survey of Developers and Property Managers, dated July 2018 by Morris A. Davis, we would expect 22 to 23 school age children with a similar affordable-to-market rate mix. 

In short, the wild and misguided “scare numbers” that have been circulating of 75 to 100 children are far higher than any data-driven estimate.

Q9. Time to Complete

On page 28 of your proposal, you estimate that it will take you two years to receive approval to commence construction and an additional two years to complete the project, from the commencement of construction – a total of four years. Correct?

ANSWER: Four years is likely a conservative outside date; we see a path to beat the two- year approval schedule and we can build this project in about 18 months.

Q10. Traffic

How much vehicular traffic do you expect that this project will generate? What is the basis for your calculation? How does your estimate compare with levels of vehicular traffic that existed when the Bancroft organization was fully functional on the site?  

ANSWER: Our community will not have a noticeable impact on local traffic and, given its walkable location, we expect many residents will walk to their destination whenever possible, whether to access the train or any of Haddonfield’s many wonderful restaurants and shops. 

Per the Institute of Traffic of Engineers, the proposed community will generate approximately 60 total trips in the AM peak hour (12 inbound and 48 outbound) and approximately 71 total trips in the PM peak hour (46 inbound and 25 outbound). 

Of course, a full traffic study will be prepared and testified to during the site plan approval process.

Q11. Architectural Style

In what ways will you customize the “Woodmont style” (i.e. the typical external appearance of your developments) to suit Haddonfield’s historic and architectural environment and the community’s sensibilities?

ANSWER: Every town and every project is different. Communities we have constructed in other towns have been designed to respond to their specific contexts. As just a few examples, our red-brick buildings in historic Morristown differ from our modern loft building in Red Bank that differ from our garden-style buildings in more suburban locations. 

This community will be designed to harmonize with Haddonfield’s historic architecture. We will continue to study the heritage of Haddonfield and bring forth designs that capture both the specific community heritage of Haddonfield, and foster aspirations for its future. Throughout the design process, we would seek to incorporate community viewpoints and perspectives through collaboration with the Borough, its residents, and other stakeholders. We don’t have a rendering to share of these buildings not only because their overall form is still to be determined but their architecture as well. This will be a clean-sheet design that will be created and refined through the above process.

Q12. Environmental Factors

What effects, if any, will your project have on the 300-foot riparian zone along the Cooper River? Conversely, what effects, if any, will the 300-foot riparian zone have on your project?

ANSWER: This project will adhere to the NJDEP regulations governing the 300-foot riparian zone along the Cooper River. We will be removing most existing paved areas in this buffer, which will result in a substantial net reduction in impervious and an increase in vegetated area. As we return this area to nature, we are proposing a mulch walking path open to the public that will meander through this bucolic viewshed. 

In addition, the extensive stormwater management measures that we will institute will enhance the quality and reduce the overall flow of water from the property to the Cooper River.

Q13. Property Taxes

Woodmont has proposed to make periodic payments to the municipality in lieu of property taxes. What is a PILOT (Payment In Lieu of Taxes), and why is it an appropriate mechanism for the Bancroft redevelopment project?

ANSWER: Under New Jersey law PILOTs come in different forms, but the PILOT being considered at Bancroft is what is known as a long-term tax abatement. Under the existing ad valorem tax methodology, taxpayers pay real estate taxes based upon a percentage of the assessed value. 

Under the State statutory PILOT rules set forth in NJSA 40A:20-1 et seq., the property owner pays a percentage of gross income to the town so that the town directly shares in the success of the project as rents increase over time. The percentage typically varies from 10% to 15%, so every time the landowner receives $1, ten to fifteen cents goes to the town. The term of the PILOT is typically 25 to 30 years, with the project converting to ad valorem taxation upon expiration of the PILOT term.

Many municipalities around the State are employing PILOTs to assist them in meeting their affordable housing requirements and in encouraging redevelopment of under-utilized properties to increase their tax base. Importantly, municipalities cannot simply issue a PILOT – pursuant to State law, a town must first conclude that the site is an “area in need of redevelopment” and the redeveloper must then demonstrate a need for the program through a financial showing. 

At Bancroft, development of the affordable homes, the requirement to refurbish dilapidated historic buildings, and the possible need for off-site improvements on top of the already high construction and financing costs of the project will drive a showing of need.

Bancroft: Q&A on Affordable Housing

In the June 21, 2024 issue of Haddonfield Today, we published answers to a baker’s dozen of questions we posed to Woodmont Properties, the designated redeveloper for 8.2 acres of land at Kings Hwy E and Hopkins Lane, known as Bancroft.

Since Affordable Housing is a complex matter and there is a widespread lack of understanding, we asked McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, the Borough’s redevelopment counsel, to answer the following questions.  

Q1. Affordable Housing 101

What is the “Mount Laurel Decision,” and what obligations does it place on municipalities in New Jersey with respect to the provision of affordable housing?

ANSWER: The Mount Laurel Decision refers to a series of NJ Supreme Court decisions from the 1970s and 1980s through the decades up to the current time. Generally, the Mt. Laurel case law provides that all towns in the State must address their fair share affordable housing obligations in order for the Courts to find a town’s overall zoning to be valid. Over time, the NJ Supreme Court has generally upheld the Fair Housing Act, the 1986 legislative answer to the Mt. Laurel cases. The NJ Supreme Court’s 2015 Mt. Laurel decision dramatically changed the way towns addressed their “fair share” affordable housing obligations. Towns no longer needed to seek approval from the Council on Affordable Housing (“COAH”). Instead, most towns (including Haddonfield) voluntarily filed Declaratory Judgment actions with the Superior Court to protect their zoning from a Builder’s Remedy lawsuit, as discussed below.

Q2. Haddonfield’s Obligation

How many affordable housing units is Haddonfield obligated to provide, and by what date, under the most recent plan approved by the Council on Affordable Housing?

ANSWER: Haddonfield’s Third Round Fair Share obligation is as follows:

• Rehabilitation Share: 11 units

• Prior Round 1987-1999 Obligation: 192 units

• Third Round 1999-2025 Gap and Prospective Obligation: 320 units

The Superior Court adjusted the 512-unit cumulative Prior Round/Third Round obligation to an 83-unit Realistic Development Potential (RDP) and a 429-unit unmet need through a vacant-land adjustment. Again, the Superior Court – not COAH – approved the Borough’s 2019 Housing Element and Fair Share Plan (“HEFSP”) with specific compliance measures to address the 83-unit RDP and, among several measures, overlay inclusionary zoning to provide possible future opportunities to address unmet need.

Q3. Current Status

How many occupied affordable housing units are there in Haddonfield currently, and where are they located? How many units are actively under construction or renovation, and where are they located?

ANSWER: There are 48 senior affordable units at Tarditi Commons (on Lincoln Avenue), and four units of affordable housing located in the Kings Court condominiums. Twenty units of affordable housing are under construction on Snowden Avenue. Six properties were purchased by the Borough of Haddonfield to provide eight total affordable units. The locations are: locations are:

• Haddonfield Commons 1 unit

• Fowler Avenue 1 unit

• Lake Street 1 unit

• Stiles Avenue 3 units

• Tanner Street 2 units

These eight units are currently being renovated and it is anticipated that they will be fully occupied by year-end.

Q4. Current Status

What triggers the requirement to provide affordable housing units?

ANSWER: As a court-approved vacant-land adjustment town, the Borough must require 20% affordable units for all development that has five or more total residential units. In addition, there are nine specific overlay areas that require a 20% affordable housing set-aside of the total number of residential units. These nine areas are located within the downtown districts.

Q5. Snowden Avenue Project

What entity owns the Snowden Avenue project? Where did the money come from to build it?

ANSWER: The developer for the Snowden Avenue project is Community Investment Strategies. The project is owned by E&B Housing LLC. The majority of the funding for the project came from the Municipal Settlement Fund, a part of the Department of Community Affairs’ Affordable Housing Trust Fund, and in part from the Borough of Haddonfield’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund.

Q6. Scattered Housing

What entity owns the single residences? Where did the money come from to purchase and renovate them?

ANSWER: The single residences are owned by Haddonfield Housing Agency, an affordable housing nonprofit that the Commissioners created. The start-up funds for the renovations came from the Borough’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund.

Q7. Immediate Future

How many additional affordable housing units does the Borough hope to approve or acquire by the end of 2025?

ANSWER: The Borough’s plan includes a minimum of ten family affordable rental units on the property formerly owned by Bancroft by June 2025. The Woodmont Properties proposal includes an additional eight units, which the Commissioners anticipate as satisfying prospective obligation(s) and/or accounting for unmet need, which will be revisited shortly as a result of recently passed legislation.

Q8. Borough’s Obligations at Bancroft

If the contract between the Borough and Woodmont Properties (to construct and manage 120 rental units on the Bancroft site, including 18 affordable housing units) were rescinded or somehow become null and void and the Bancroft site were to became dedicated open space, what implications would that have for the Borough’s obligations under the 2020 court-approved agreement between the Borough and Fair Share Housing Center?

ANSWER: The Borough needs to include ten units of affordable housing on the site or obtain permission and a time extension from Fair Share Housing Center and the Court in order to acquire additional property(s) and construct these ten units. The Borough has established that it does not own any properties where construction of ten units would be feasible; nor does it have enough time or available funds in its Affordable Housing Trust Fund to purchase, renovate, and convert ten existing market-rate units within Haddonfield to affordable units, or to identify, acquire, and construct ten brand-new units elsewhere.

Q9. Rental Process

What is the rental application process for affordable units? How many applications were received for the most recent rental opportunity?

ANSWER: The Borough’s Housing Agency has subcontracted with Triad Inc. (an experienced Affordable Housing Administrative Agent) to fully address the State’s Uniform Housing Affordability Controls and Federal Housing Administration requirements in implementing the affordable housing rental application process.  Over 2,500 applications have been received to date, illustrating the need for affordable housing and the demand for access to affordable housing within Haddonfield.

Q10. Housing Management

What entity sets the rents for affordable units?

ANSWER: In addition to addressing the Uniform Housing Affordability Controls, Triad Inc., will establish allowable rents, affirmatively market affordable units, income-qualify eligible tenant households, deed-restrict affordable units, etc.

Q11. Consequences of Failure to Comply

What is a “Builder’s Remedy,” lawsuit and what could give rise to such a lawsuit in relation to a municipality’s legal obligation to provide its “fair share” of affordable housing?

ANSWER: Typically, a builder-developer/builder-plaintiff sues a town to attempt to get a 

Builder’s Remedy on a site they control that is NOT currently designated for inclusionary zoning (one affordable unit provided for every four market-rate units, or a 20% affordable housing set-aside). Such Builder’s Remedy lawsuit is typically for higher density, multi-family housing on a site not contemplated by the town for high-density residential housing. A builder-plaintiff suing a town would have to win in court on three main points, the first of which is whether the town has addressed its fair share affordable housing obligations. If the answer is no, only then can the Builder’s Remedy complaint proceed in Court to determine the suitability of the builder-plaintiff’s site, and whether they propose a substantial amount of affordable housing.

Q12. Action in Other Towns

Have any Builder’s Remedy lawsuits been litigated and settled in New Jersey in recent times? If so, please give one or two examples.

ANSWER: Yes. Towns continue to get sued for Builder’s Remedies – as recently as 2023 in Monmouth County, for example. Settlements are not just between a town and Fair Share Housing Center, but also may be between a town and a builder-plaintiff. In the Third Round, there have been approximately 375 voluntary settlements between Fair Share Housing Center and towns, possibly another 30 to 40 settlements between builder-plaintiffs and towns, with the balance of towns in the State having not participated in the voluntary Court process or in resolving Builder’s Remedy litigation.

Q13. A Potential Threat to Haddonfield

What actions, or lack of actions, by the Borough could trigger a Builder’s Remedy lawsuit in Haddonfield?

ANSWER: The Borough may be subject to a Builder’s Remedy lawsuit if it refuses to implement its court-approved Third Round Housing Element and Fair Share Plan without first working out an amendment to its settlement agreement with Fair Share Housing Center, and achieving court approval of such amended settlement, and ultimately getting court approval of an amended Third Round Housing Element and Fair Share Plan. At this late stage of the Third Round, which ends in June 2025, Fair Share Housing Center and the Superior Court are unlikely to permit the Borough to transfer family affordable rental units off the Bancroft inclusionary housing site.

Commissioners select Bancroft developer

Haddonfield’s Board of Commissioners on Monday evening [May 13, 2024] adopted a resolution designating Woodmont Properties (Woodmont) as the conditional redeveloper of an 8.2-acre parcel in downtown Haddonfield. Consisting of a portion of the former Bancroft Site along Kings Highway, the redevelopment area is located on the east side of Hopkins Lane, in the vicinity of Haddonfield Memorial High School and Pennypacker Park. The Borough issued a request for qualifications and proposals for the acquisition and redevelopment of the area in May 2023. After a competitive process that culminated in the Borough’s thorough evaluation of nine proposals from developers throughout the region, Woodmont was selected to lead the project.

“Woodmont Properties is a well-established, regional developer with an impressive track record of successful redevelopment throughout New Jersey, and we’re thrilled to have their partnership on this project,” said Haddonfield Mayor Colleen Bianco Bezich. “The Borough has been focused on finding the best path forward for the Bancroft Site, and we are excited to work with Woodmont to make this a truly community-centered and welcoming gateway to our Borough.”

“Haddonfield is a premier community in New Jersey, and Woodmont is honored to have been entrusted with the redevelopment of this important site in the Borough’s Historic District, steps from downtown,” said Stephen Santola, Woodmont’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel. “We look forward to partnering with the Borough and leveraging our expertise in redevelopment to transform the Bancroft Site and bring it to its full potential.”

Based in Fairfield, N.J., Woodmont has 60 years of experience developing, building, marketing and investing in residential and commercial properties. The team has completed numerous major residential and mixed-use redevelopment projects in municipalities throughout the region such as Morristown, Saddle River, Cranford, Red Bank and Metuchen.

A public presentation of the project will take place on June 17, 2024, at which time the community will have the opportunity to provide feedback.

For more information about Woodmont, please visit https://www.woodmontproperties.com/.

The following description of the Woodmont Properties proposal was published by njpen.com on August 11, 2023.

Woodmont Properties of Fairfield, NJ
Eric Witmondt, CEO

Established in 1963, Woodmont Properties is a regional real estate developer operating primarily in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Its vision for the Bancroft site is 108 market-rate rental apartments and 12 affordable units, none of which are age-restricted, in 3.5-story buildings with integrated and detached parking garages.

“We concluded that non-age-restricted inclusionary housing would best achieve the borough’s goals and objectives,” Woodmont wrote, by “maximiz[ing]housing affordability, diversity, and availability.

“Townhomes are unlikely to achieve the borough’s goal of increasing its housing diversity to provide existing residents with less expensive downsizing options, as any new townhomes constructed on this site will be priced at the top of the market,” the developer wrote. “Our apartments, while spacious, will be modestly sized in comparison to single-family homes in the area.”

Most of the units would be two-bedroom layouts, with some one-bedroom units. All apartments would offer single-level living, with integrated and detached garages, and “top-of-the-market” amenities.

The Woodmont proposal also occupies a smaller footprint than some of the other projects; its seven-acre purchase price excludes 1.2 acres that will be dedicated to public open space and padding the green buffer with the Cooper River. The developer also envisions constructing walking and cycling paths and electric vehicle charging stations onsite.

Its construction would include green building technologies, and design features chosen to approximate local historic district styles, with brick, painted fiber-cement, and glass. The Woodmont proposal didn’t account for any schoolchildren generated, but promised a fiscal impact study will follow.

Purchase price: $5.85 million for 7 acres, assuming a 10-percent PILOT. Woodmont estimates that the project would generate annual payments of $440,000 upon its completion, and that the project could be constructed within 24 months.

Comparable projects from the same developer: Woodmont Metro at Metuchen Station; Woodmont Station at Cranford; Woodmont Townsquare, Washington Township; Metropolitan Lofts at Morristown.

For Matt Skoufalos’s njpen.com article on this matter, go HERE.

HMHS Boys Basketball: 2023–24 Season in Review

By Lauree Padgett / Exclusive to Haddonfield[dot]Today

In a 30-game season in which the Dawgs won 90% of their games, with a 27–3 overall record, a 12–0 record in the Liberty division of the Colonial Conference, and a total sweep of the Colonial at large, not to mention the Dawgs defeating their first 21 opponents, there are going to be a lot of highlights! Here are the ones (“wons”) that stand out for me in (mostly) chronological order.

• December 14: In the first game of the season, the host Dawgs beat nemesis Haddon Heights but only by 5 points, 51–46. The Dawgs were trailing at the half by a point, but took a 3-point, 33–30, lead into the fourth and hung on to start the season 1–0. Senior Sam Narducci poured in 20 points, and his two first-quarter 3’s kept the Garnets from having a bigger halftime lead. In the Colonial rematch at Heights on January 25, the game was never in question. The Dawgs were up by double digits, 19–8, after 1, 44–21 at the half, and really stifled the Garnet student section with a blowout 83–32 win. Eleven Dawgs contributed to those 83 points, and the top-scoring Dawgs, seniors Phil McFillin (21), Matt Morris (19), and Narducci (13), finished with more points collectively than the Garnets.

• December 16: In the Jimmy V Classic at Cherokee versus Camden Catholic, the Dawgs led in all four quarters against the Irish, but the second half got a bit close. The Dawgs went into the third quarter up by 9, but the Irish cut that to 6 by the end of the third. With 3:30 left in the game, Camden Catholic got to within 3, 38–35, but Matt Morris helped to keep the Irish at bey, scoring a basket after Patrick Ryan had gotten a point back from the foul line. That made it a 6-point game again. The Irish would get within 4 with 39.4 seconds on the clock, but Sam Narducci made 2 foul shots, Daire Roddy made 1, and Morris closed out the scoring with a pair at the line as well, as the Dawgs held on to win 48–42. Unfortunately, the Irish would have more luck against the Dawgs in the Camden County tournament in February.

• December 19, 21, and 22: In their next three games, the Dawgs beat their opponents (Haddon Township, West Deptford, and Atlantic City Institute of Technology) by 48, 59, and 58 points, respectively. In the latter two games, the Dawgs scored 95 and 96 points. Amazingly, their 59-point thrashing of the Eagles of West Deptford would not be the most points tallied or the widest margin of victory of their 27 wins.

• January 3 and 5: In the new year, the Dawgs kept streaking along against Colonial rivals. Paulsboro is almost always a tough matchup on the Red Raiders’ home turf. However, the only time the Red Raiders were ahead this game was after a bucket on their first possession put them in front by 2. From there on in, it was all Haddonfield. The Dawgs got the next 7 points, and were up by 8, 12–4, at the 3:20 mark. The Red Raiders’ 3 at the end of the quarter got them to within 4, 14–10, and they got the first basket of the second to make it a 1-point game before the Dawgs started pulling away. They won by 18, 43–25. A few nights later, the Silver Knights of Sterling galloped into Haddonfield, but it was the Dawgs who rode to a 28-point, 67–39, win. Matt Morris and Sam Narducci each put 20 on the board.

• January 8: The Lindenwold Lions would become part of history, but end up on the wrong end of it, at Haddonfield. This night, the Dawgs broke a school record previously held by the 1989 squad, coached by Dave Wiedeman and led on the court by son Paul. The 1989 team had put up 108 points to Haddon Township’s 63, winning by 45 points. With both Zach Langan and Nate Rohlfing on the bench from the outset, every other varsity and JV player—12 total—saw playing time. Nine of them helped the Dawgs rack up 121 points to Lindenwold’s 50. So not only did the Dawgs break that 1989 record for points scored, surpassing the previous winning amount by 13, they also held the Lions to 26 fewer points than what Haddon Township put up against the ’89 team. The Dawgs put 38 points on the board in the first, were leading by 34, 62–28, at the half, and had 99 points going into the fourth, so a 100-plus total was inevitable. Still, seeing 121 on the scoreboard when the final buzzer sounded was pretty amazing. Sam Narducci and Matt Morris outscored the Lions by themselves, 52–50. Fifteen of Narducci’s 30 points came off of 3’s, and Morris had four treys of his own to finish with 22. Patrick Ryan and Phil McFillin also hit double figures, scoring 19 and 17 points, respectively.

• January 20: The Dawgs were the “home” team against the Pitman Tigers at Paul VI’s Winter Classic. This game is noteworthy not just because of its outcome but because Pitman would go on to win the Group 1 South Jersey title before losing in the state semifinals and finishing with a 23–8 record. On this occasion, the Tigers would not play at their highest level, thanks to tough D by their opponents and Sam Narducci’s tremendous first-half offense. Thanks to his 12 points in the first and 10 more in the second, Narducci and Pitman were tied at the half, but the Dawgs were up by 24, 46–24. In the second half, Patrick Ryan took over where Narducci left off, scoring eight baskets in the paint. The Dawgs would bury the Tigers by a score of 88–50. Narducci finished with 32, Ryan added 20, and Matt Morris knocked in 13.

• February 1: Haddonfield kept rolling along in the Colonial. The Dawgs’ game at West Deptford would be their 13th in the conference. Although this would not be quite the blowout as the teams’ first matchup in December, Haddonfield still won handily, 79–44. Nate Rohlfing was busy in the paint all night, scoring 11 times and ending up with 24. Matt Morris hit five 3’s and added 17, and Phil McFillin had 13. The biggest story of this game, however, was that it marked Haddonfield’s 21st straight victory of the season without a loss.

• February 6: This game versus Paulsboro came on the heels of the Dawgs’ first defeat of the year, a 35–52 loss to Central Regional High School during the Holy Cross Academy Showdown. It was also Senior Night at Haddonfield, so if there had been any doubt how the Dawgs would respond, the “elite eight,” as I christened the seniors, erased them. Along with their 14 first-quarter points, the Dawgs held the Red Raiders to 2 points on the defensive end. By the half, the Dawgs had more than tripled the Raiders’ total and were up by 32–10. The final score would be 73–29. Senior Mike Feinstein, who saw playing time during all four quarters, swooshed in four treys and shared the scoring lead with Nate Rohlfing at 14.   

• February 8: This was the last Colonial Conference contest of the year and it was at Sterling. The Silver Knight student section, always admirably out in full force supporting their team, whether home or away, thought the Knights were going to put it to the Dawgs. In”steed,” the Dawgs would eventually have another easy win. That being said, most of the first half was a seesaw ride. After the Dawgs started out in front, Sterling went on a run and had a 5–8 and then a 7–10 lead. Haddonfield came back to put up the last 4 points, 2 from the foul line by Patrick Ryan and 2 from the floor by Nate Rohlfing, to go up 11–10. The Knights returned the favor at the start of the second, scoring 4 in a row to retake the lead 14–11. A Matt Morris 3 tied it, the Dawgs would fall behind again, tie it, go ahead, then have a 3 by the Knights put them up again by 1, 18–19. Zach Langan’s 3 would give the Dawgs a 21–19 edge with 2:26 on the clock, and they never gave up the lead after that. The final score was 67–38. Morris had 20, Rohlfing and Phil McFillin (who had a bit of interaction with the Sterling student section after some big third quarter 3’s) added 13 each, and Langan put up 12. This win gave the Dawgs not only a clean, 10–0, sweep of the Liberty division, they finished 15–0 in overall conference play.

• February 10, 12, and 14: The Dawgs went 2–3 in the Camden County tournament this year. After getting a first-round bye, the Dawgs hosted the Winslow Township Eagles in the second round. This was a pretty typical game for the Dawgs. They outscored the Eagles 9–1 to start the game and were up by 16, 20–4, after 1 period. The halftime score was Haddonfield 36, Winslow Township 13. At the end of the third, the Dawgs had more than doubled the Eagles, ahead by 28, 51–23, and won by 36, 67–31. Sophomore Mike Douglas scored 16 points and Nate Rohlfing put up 15. Two days later, in the third round versus the Cherry Hill West Lions at Eastern Regional High School, Rohlfing would put on a defensive show of force. It was a good thing, too, because this match would be a much closer one. There were a lot of ties in the first 8 minutes. The Lions even pulled ahead twice. About halfway through the quarter, they went up 5–7, and after baskets by Daire Roddy and Patrick Ryan put the Dawgs back in front 10–9,  the Lions recaptured the lead off a 3, 10–9, with 1:27 on the clock. A response 3 by Sam Narducci and a 2 by Rohlfing in between a Lion foul shot put the Dawgs up 14–11, which is how the quarter ended. The second 8 minutes also went back and forth. The Lions got the first 5 points to go up by 1, 15–14, but a bucket by Narducci gave the Dawgs back the lead. Just when it looked like the Dawgs were taking control of the game, going up by 7, 24–17 on a waaaay out there 3 by Narducci with 2:49 left, the Lions got 5 of the last 7 points and were within 4, 26–44, at the half. The third quarter was even tighter. Although the Lions never went ahead, they got to within 1 twice and a pair of foul shots brought them to within 2, 38–36, going into the final 8 minutes. The Lions kept pawing away in the fourth. A basket with 5:26 on the clock got them to within 1, 43–42, and they had a chance to tie it at the foul line, but failed. However, after Rohlfing hit 1–2 at the line, the Lions got another chance there and hit both, tying the game at 44 with just under 5 minutes left in the game. A drive in the paint from Ryan and a 3 from Narducci made it 49–44, but a 2 from the Lions got them to within 3, 49–46, with 2:49 on the clock. That was as close as they would get, as the Dawgs were able to pull away in the final minutes to win by 9, 57–48. Narducci led the Dawgs with 15, and Phil McFillin contributed 14. Along with his 11 blocked shots, Rohlfing scored 13. Round four, the semifinals of the Camden County Tournament, pitted Haddonfield against Camden Catholic again, this time at Camden Eastside. The Dawgs looked sharp at the outset, jumping to an 8–1 lead off 2 foul shots by Roddy, at the 3:19 mark of the first quarter. After the Irish hit a 3, McFillin answered the call, making it 11–4, Dawgs with 2:07 left in the quarter. The teams then exchanged 2’s, Haddonfield’s coming from Narducci, to keep it a 7-point game in favor of the Dawgs with 1:33 on the clock. The Irish got an easy 2 with 7.3 seconds to go, cutting the Dawgs’ lead to 5, 13–8, as the quarter ended. The Dawgs would not be ahead at the end of a quarter again, as fatigue seemed to set in, causing uncharacteristic bad passes, missed shots, and general disjointed play. At the half, they were trailing by 2, 18–20, and going into the fourth, the Irish were up by 5, 29–24. The final score was 46–47, Camden Catholic. McFillin was the only Dawg in double digits, finishing with 14.

• February 21, 26, and 28. The Dawgs were the fourth seed in the South Jersey Group 2 playoffs. Since I wrote up the recaps of these last three games of the season recently, I’m not going to go into much detail here. If you want more play-by-play, you can find it in my previous two Haddonfield.Today articles. The round 1 match against Manchester Township, which was the Dawgs’ only game of the week on 2/21, got its own article, and the second and third rounds are written up in the article prior to this one. The Manchester Hawks did not give the Dawgs too much of a fight. Although they did outscore Haddonfield in the second quarter by 6 to get to within 5, 25–20, at the half, the Dawgs were able to keep them from mounting anymore of a comeback and won by 11, 44–33. Nate Rohlfing and Sam Narducci were high scorers for the Dawgs, with 15 and 13, respectively. The round 2 contest against the Cape May Tigers would prove to be closer and a bit more exciting. One of the biggest sequence of events came in the first quarter with the Dawgs up by 3, 12–9. It started with a pickoff by Patrick Ryan, who passed the ball to Narducci. Narducci’s feed to Rohlfing brought down the house, as Rohlfing slammed it home. In the second quarter, with 2:16 on the clock, Daire Roddy handed the ball to Rohlfing under the basket. This time, Rohlfing’s hesitation move caught the Tigers off guard and his basket put the Dawgs up by 5, 24-19. In those last 2 minutes, the Tigers would put 4 on the board, holding the Dawgs scoreless, and at the half, it was a 1-point, 24–23 game. The Tigers took the lead twice early in the second half, but at the 4:28 mark, a pass from Ryan to Rohlfing put the Dawgs back on top 31–29. The Dawgs would never trail again and won 51–42. Rohlfing went up and in 9 times, adding 2 from the line, to finish with 21 points; Narducci had 14. Two nights later on their court, Middle Township would end the Dawgs’ spectacular season. But it took the highly favored Panthers overtime (and a lot of stall-ball tactics) to do it. The 38–46 defeat was hard to watch, especially since it meant the careers of the eight seniors, who had played together since middle school, had also come to an end, but it also proved that the Dawgs had not, as many had inferred, been overrated despite their 27–3 record.

Stat Toppers: For a complete rundown of player stats, from games played to baskets (3’s, 2’s, and foul shots) made and everything in between, including power points, go to this site off NJ.com.: https://highschoolsports.nj.com/school/haddonfield-haddonfield/boysbasketball/season/2023-2024/stats. Note that you might need a subscription to view this page. But fear not: I’ll share a few of the best here. Not surprisingly, even with his two stints watching from the sidelines, Sam Narducci led the team with points scored (411). He was followed by Phil McFillin (328), Nate Rohlfing (294), and Patrick Ryan (216). All totaled, 14 players contributed to the Dawgs putting 1,977 points on the board over 30 games. Narducci (69) and McFillin (68) were neck-in-neck with 3-pointers made. The four Dawgs who made the most foul shots were Rohlfing (38), Matt Morris (31), Narducci (31), and Ryan (30). Morris was the most consistent from the line, making almost 89% of his shots. I think the assists stats are the most incredible and really are at the heart of why the Dawgs won 27 games. While Roddy was way ahead of the pack (157), look how many other Dawgs had 40 or more: sophomore Mike Douglas (45), McFillin (46), Morris (47), Narducci (55), and Ryan (73). Defensively, Ryan (244) and Rohlfing (201) led the team in rebounds. They also were tops in blocks: Rohlfing finished with 53 and Ryan with 45. Impressive as well were the steal leaders: Roddy (48), Narducci (46), and Ryan (46). Four seniors, McFillin, Morris, Roddy, and Ryan, played in all of Haddonfield’s 30 games.

My Personal Highlight: As much as I love being in the stands and cheering on the Dawgs, especially when they have a season like this one, what will be my favorite memory did not take place on the court this year. It happened in the HMHS cafeteria on February 6, Senior Night, when I had the chance to sit down with the eight seniors—Matt, Phil, Ryan, Sam, Mike, Daire, Zach, and Nate—and interview them. They were funny, engaging, polite, and through their answers showed how much they cared about each other on and off the court. They will be greatly missed in many ways next season, but they will be forever more a part of the Haddonfield boys basketball legacy. I wish them continued success in their post-high school years. And I have one request of them: Please come back and “visit”!

HMHS Boys Basketball: SJ Group 2 playoffs

By Lauree Padgett / Exclusive to Haddonfield[dot]Today

Quarter- and Semifinal Games

The Haddonfield boys basketball teams battled two tough opponents this past week during the South Jersey Group 2 tournament. At home on Monday, 2/26, they went up against the Tigers of Lower Cape May. Wednesday was a long road trip down to Atlantic County to face the Middle Township Panthers, who were seeded number 2, behind Camden, in the Group 2 brackets. As you probably know by now, the Dawgs were victorious in one match and went down fighting in overtime in the second. Both were exciting, heart-pounding games as I’ll do my best to describe below.

SJ Group 2 Quarterfinal round—February 26, 2024: Lower Cape May at Haddonfield

I was concerned about this game. Just like in the NCAA men’s basketball tournament, second-round games can often knock out the favored team. While the Dawgs had taken care of Manchester Township, who had a below .500 overall record, in the opening round, the game wasn’t a blowout. Lower Cape May was expected to be even more of a challenge.

Just as he had done in the opening seconds of the Manchester Township game, Phil McFillin hit a 3 to put the Dawgs on the board (but wasn’t fouled this time). Dawg fans had barely stopped cheering when the Tigers did the same to make it 3 all with about 40 seconds gone. Off a feed from Patrick Ryan, Nate Rohlfing went up and in and was fouled. His shot put the Dawgs up by 3 again, and again, the Tigers sent in a 3, tying it at 6 with 6:25 on the clock.

Haddonfield missed its next shot attempt, but Patrick Ryan got the offensive board, and this time McFillin passed it to Rohlfing in the paint, whose bucket made it 8–6, Dawgs. A leaping pickoff by Daire Roddy did not result in a basket for Haddonfield, but the Dawgs did get their first foul of the quarter, and then knocked the ball out of bounds. When Lower Cape May knocked down its third trey in a row to go up by 1, 9–8, there was a collective murmur in the Haddonfield section that sounded a lot like, “Ut-oh.”

To make matters worse, the Dawgs lost the ball out of bounds their next possession on a bad pass. Roddy came to the rescue with a steal, passed it to Sam Narducci, who hustled cross court for a basket. Now the Dawgs were up by 1, 10–9, with 3:46 left in the quarter. Roddy almost got another steal but instead was assessed with his first foul of the game. But then a few seconds later, he and Ryan did combine for a steal. Although the Dawgs’ first shot did not drop, Rohlfing pulled down the offensive board and put the ball in the net, making it 12–9, Dawgs, with 2:13 remaining.

Ryan blocked a Tigers’ shot, then pulled down the rebound. The Dawgs did not score, but Ryan not only got it back, he set up a slam from Rohlfing off a feed from Narducci with 37.2 on the clock. Naturally, the crowd rooting for the Dawgs went wild. Lower Cape May got the last 2 points of the quarter from the foul line, so when the horn sounded, the Dawgs were leading by 3, 14–11.

The Tigers and Dawgs exchanged missed shots to begin the second quarter. The first basket came off a steal by Narducci and a pass to Rohlfing from Zach Langan. Rohlfing’s fifth field goal of the half gave the Dawgs a 5-point, 16–11, advantage with 6:13 on the clock.

Lower Cape May called a timeout about 15 seconds later. Although Roddy blocked the Tigers’ shot attempt, they got it back and scored. At the other end, the Dawgs’ missed shot went out of bounds off the Tigers, and after the Dawgs inbounded, Langan set up Rohlfing for another bucket in the paint, pushing Haddonfield’s lead back to 5, 18–13. Roddy was all over the court and tipped the ball out of bounds. Lower Cape May made the most of getting the ball back, dropping in its 4th trey of the game and cutting the deficit down to 2, 18–16, with about 4:30 left in the half.

In what looked more like a foul than a steal, Lower Cape May got the ball back and missed the resulting shot. Narducci pulled down the defensive board and did one of his famous cross-court sprints to go up and in. The Dawgs’ 4-point lead only lasted for about 30 seconds, as the Tigers set up a 3-point basket (its fifth of the half, in case you hadn’t been counting), and all the sudden, it was a 1-point game, 20–19, with 3:26 to go until halftime.

Matt Morris got his own rebound off a missed shot and passed it to Narducci, who hit a nice jumper to give the Dawgs a 3-point edge, 22–19. It looked like that lead was going to go back down to 1 as a Tiger had a wide open shot under the basket—and totally missed it. Langan secured the board, passed it to Roddy, who fed it to Rohlfing. His hesitation move enabled Rohlfing to fake out the Tiger under the basket and score, and with 2:16 on the clock, the Dawgs were back to being up by 5, 24–19.

Lower Cape May called another timeout, but when play resumed, good pressure “D” by a trio of Dawgs tight to the line caused a Tiger turnover with just under 2 minutes to go in the half. The Dawgs almost lost the ball on an errant pass, but Morris saved it. He couldn’t prevent the missed shot by Mike Douglas, but Douglas hustled down to the other end of the court in time to block a Tiger shot and then with help from Rohlfing, picked off the ball. That was to no avail, as the next Dawg shot also did not go in.

This time, the Tigers’ shot dropped, and with 40.1 on the clock, it was back to a 3-point game with the Dawgs on top 24–21. The Dawgs lost their scoring opportunity with a pass misfire, and Lower Cape May took advantage, scoring again to get within 1, 24–23, with about 23 seconds to go until the half. The Dawgs waited until there were 3 seconds to shoot, the ball did not find the net, and as the players walked off the court, the Dawgs were only up by a point, 24–23.

That 1-point lead flipped to a 1-point deficit to start the third quarter. The Dawgs inbounded but did not score, and with 6:42 on the clock, the Tigers’ retook the lead, 25–24, with a 2-pointer. Before Dawg fans could start to get too uneasy, McFillin set up Rohlfing under the basket, and he put the Dawgs back on top by 1, 26–25, at the 6:20 mark. Under their basket, the Tigers grabbed that lead back, making it 27–26 in their favor with 6:11 left in the quarter.

A Lower Cape May foul sent the Dawgs to the sidelines to inbound the ball. Roddy, tasked with getting the ball in play, found an open Narducci beyond the arc, passed him the ball, and Narducci responded with his first, well-timed, trey of the game. The Dawgs’ 29–27 advantage lasted about 50 seconds. An offensive board by the Tigers enabled them to get a second-chance bucket and with 4:46 to go in the third, the game was in a dead heat at 29 all.

It was time for the Dawgs to show an extra layer of toughness and that’s what they did. It started with Patrick Ryan getting an assist on a basket by Rohlfing. Defense, Haddonfield’s not so secret weapon, caused a turnover, and this time, Ryan set up Narducci for his second trey in less than 2 minutes. The game had gone from being knotted at 29 with 4:46 on the clock to the Dawgs being ahead by 5, 34–29, with 4:00 minutes showing. The Tigers called a timeout.

Lower Cape May turned the ball over after the timeout on an offensive foul. Ryan, who is quick to react to anything on the court, saved an off-kelter pass, and then drove into the paint only to dish off the ball at the last second to Rohlfing, who was fouled. His first shot from the line dropped, but the second didn’t, and with 3:12 left in the half, the Dawgs’ lead had expanded to 6 points, 35–29.

At the other end of the court, Roddy was called for a foul. The usually unflappable Roddy got a bit, well, flappable, but Narducci and then McFillin came over to help him settle down. The Tigers went 1–2 at the line, so with 2:50 showing on the scoreboard, it was a 35–31 game. When the Dawgs got the ball to their end, they started passing, and with 2:11 on the clock, the Tigers committed their fourth foul of the quarter. Once the ball was inbounded, Roddy made a sweet pass to Rohlfing. His shot didn’t go in, but he got to the foul line again with 1:49 remaining in the quarter. Rohlfing’s first shot went in and out, and the second one went in and through the net.

The Tigers proved they still had some gas in their tank, nailing a 3 their next possession, which cut the Dawgs’ lead to 2, 36–34, with 1:36 on the clock. The two teams gave up the ball on bad passes, and when Haddonfield got the ball back, Narducci was fouled. He stepped to the line with 55.8 on the clock and both balls went swishing through the net, giving the Dawgs a 38–34 lead. A half-second after the buzzer, what would have been a 3 from the Tigers went in, but did not count. This meant the Dawgs were going to take that 4-point lead into the final quarter of play.

Lower Cape May had the possession arrow to start the fourth and got a much-too-easy 2 off an unguarded basket. Now it was 38–36 with 7:35 left in somebody’s season. It took some seconds off the clock before Roddy scored, but almost immediately, the Tigers got that bucket back to keep the Dawgs’ lead to 2 points, 40–38, with 6:16 on the clock. Morris got fouled under the Dawgs’ basket. He made the first but not the second shot, inching that lead up to 41–38.

Between shots, coach Paul Wiedeman made a somewhat surprising move that got the crowd a bit stirred up. When the quarter had started, Roddy, Morris, Ryan, Narducci, and Rohlfing had been on the court. Even though Rohlfing was responsible for 21 of the Dawgs’ 40 points, Wiedeman took him out and put in McFillin. This switch put his five quickest seniors on the floor. But would it pay off?

The results looked dicey at first, as the Tigers scored to get back to within 1, 41–40, with 5:33 on the clock. But then Ryan picked up where Rohlfing left off, and instead of setting up baskets, he started making them. His first came off a feed from Roddy. Roddy then grabbed a defensive board under the Tiger basket and down at the Dawg end, set up McFillin for a field goal. With 5 and change left, the Dawgs were up by 5, 45–40. The Tigers did not score, there was a scuffle for the basket that wasn’t pretty, but Ryan came up with it. And at the other end, off a feed from McFillin, Ryan got another 2 in the paint. Now it was 47–40, Dawgs, with half a period left in the game.

Lower Cape May called a timeout. Once back in play with the ball, their shot was deflected by Ryan. Roddy went in for a shot, ended up on his knees, and with 3:21, Lower Cape May was called for a foul. Apparently, the refs didn’t think Roddy had been in the act of shooting, so he did not get a trip to the foul line, and instead the Dawgs lost the ball out of bounds. Haddonfield then picked up a foul at the 2:55 mark, sending Lower Cape May to the foul line. Both shots went in, getting the Tigers back to within 5, 47–42.

Haddonfield had to inbound. Morris made a nice pass to get it in play, and then under the Dawg basket, McFillin set Ryan up for his third basket of the quarter, giving the Dawgs back a 7-point, 49–42, advantage with 2:24 on the clock. The fans and the players were feeling that a W was imminent. That feeling grew after Morris leapt up to block the Tigers’ next scoring attempt and Ryan dove onto the floor to go after the loose ball. Roddy inbounded but Haddonfield got stuck on the sidelines. Lower Cape May helped them out by committing a foul. A second later, they were called for another foul, their third of the quarter, and then about 13 seconds later, at the 1:31 mark, knocked the ball out of bounds.

After a missed Haddonfield shot, Ryan pulled down the offensive board and Wiedeman called a timeout with 1:10 left in the game. The Tigers sent another ball out of bounds before McFillin and Ryan combined for what would be the game’s last 2 points with 1:05 on the clock. When the horn sounded 65 seconds later, the Dawgs had played one of their best games of the season against a worthy opponent to best the Tigers 51–42. Rohlfing was high scorer with 21. Narducci added 14, and Ryan scored four big baskets in the fourth to finish with 8.

Quarter scores:

1st quarter: Haddonfield 14, Lower Cape May 11

2nd quarter: Haddonfield 10, Lower Cape May 12

Halftime: Haddonfield 24, Lower Cape May 23

3rd quarter: Haddonfield 14. Lower Cape May 11

4th quarter: Haddonfield 13, Lower Cape May 8

Final score: Haddonfield 51, Lower Cape May 12

Player scores:

Nate Rohlfing 21

Sam Narducci 14

Patrick Ryan 8

Phil McFillin 5

Daire Roddy 2

Matt Morris 1

South Jersey Group 2 Semifinal round—February 28, 2024: Haddonfield at Middle Township

Both Haddonfield and Middle Township, seeded fourth and second, respectively, went into Wednesday’s semifinal game with a 27–2 record. Both were also undefeated in their conferences. But Haddonfield was still the heavy “underdawg.” In fact, as Mark Hershberger and I were texting just ahead of the game (he was going to watch the stream, while I was at Middle Township), he said that as Camden was annihilating third-seeded Cinnaminson, the announcers were already talking about the South Jersey final versus Camden and Middle Township as if it were already a done deal. The prediction about a Panther vs Panther showdown did come to pass, but Haddonfield did not make it easy for Middle Township by any stretch of the imagination.

Middle Township won the tipoff to start the first quarter, but did not score. Patrick Ryan grabbed the defensive board, but Haddonfield was unable to even get a shot off due to a bad pass. The Panthers lost the ball to a Sam Narducci pickoff, and Haddonfield’s second possession ended on what could have been a trip to the foul line but instead was just a missed shot. Middle Township couldn’t score again, Nate Rohlfing got the defensive rebound this time, and another Haddonfield attempt failed to find the basket. It would take an offensive rebound by the Panthers off an airball to put points on the board at the 5:26 mark.

For the third straight game, the Dawgs’ first basket came from a Phil McFillin 3, which put the Dawgs up by 1, 3–1, with 5:03 left in the quarter. After a blocked shot by Rohlfing and a defensive rebound by Ryan, Narducci let loose with a shot behind the arc and the underdawgs  were now up 6–2 with about 4 minutes gone in the quarter. Good “D” by the Dawgs forced a Middle Township turnover, but Haddonfield could not take advantage of it, and instead got an iffy at best foul called on Rohlfing. (Unfortunately, more than once when Rohlfing was making a shot and seemed to be fouled, fouls were not called the other way.)

At their end, the Panthers scored a 2 and after a Dawg miscue on the floor that gave them back the ball, hit a 3 to go up by 1, 7–6, with 2:04 left in the quarter. Roddy drove in for a basket and Middle Township was called for an offensive foul. Haddonfield missed a shot and almost turned over the ball, but Ryan snatched it, and Narducci took it up and in with 37 seconds on the clock to put the Dawgs up 10–7. Middle Township played for the last shot, but did not score, so the first quarter ended with the Dawgs still ahead by 3.

Quarter 2 started out with Haddonfield inbounding and losing the ball on another miscommunication. Rohlfing’s blocked shot and defensive board got the ball back for Haddonfield. Ryan set him up for a shot, and Rohlfing was fouled hard. His first shot dropped; his second went in and out. Now the Dawgs were up by 4, 11–7, with about a minute and a half gone. More pressure “D” caused another Middle Township turnover and led to a 2 by Narducci off a Rohlfing pass. With 5:56 left in the half, it was 13–7, Dawgs. What was going on here?

A 3 from Middle Township followed by a blocked Haddonfield shot gave the Panthers back the ball. Not only did they score, they got a trip to the foul line and scored there as well. And in less than a minute, the Dawgs went from being up by 6 to being tied at 13. Two minutes passed with some traded turnovers/pickoffs and missed shots before a foul was called on Haddonfield. From the bench, Haddonfield coach Paul Wiedeman was heard to say, “On the floor,” meaning the foul should have been a non-shooting one. The ref did not agree with that assessment, and the Panthers picked up 2 more from the line to retake the lead 15–13 with 3:09 on the clock. A ball that was lost in transit by Haddonfield resulted in another 2, this time from the floor, by the Panthers.

With Middle Township now up by 4, 17–13, Haddonfield called a timeout at the 2:50 mark. That seemed to help, as off the inbound, Morris fed Rohlfing, who got his first basket from the field. That briefly closed the gap to 15–17, and the Dawgs had a chance to tie or go ahead after Rohlfing stole the ball. But after Haddonfield’s attempt did not go in, Middle Township responded with a 3 at the other end, which put them out in front by 5, 20–15, with 1:22 on the clock. At the Dawgs’ end, Rohlfing made for the basket but instead of going up and in, passed it out to an open McFillin, who knocked down a 3 with 53 seconds on the clock. Middle Township got the last basket of the half with 42 seconds on the clock, and when the buzzer sounded, the Dawgs were down by 4, 18–22.

Middle Township inbounded the ball to begin the second half, but Rohlfing tipped the ball to Narducci, who drove into the lane for 2 to cut the Panthers’ lead down to 2, 20–22, with about a minute gone. The Panthers answered with a 2 to push their advantage back to 4, 24–20. The Dawgs missed their next shot, but McFillin got the offensive board and then let loose with another 3, and with 6:00 on the clock, the Dawgs were back to within 1, 23–24. The Panthers’ next shot was an airball, but Haddonfield lost the ball under its basket. Rohlfing got another blocked shot, Middle Township was called for a foul, and then to the shock of almost everyone rooting for Haddonfield, Rohlfing was called for foul. This gave the ball back to the Panthers with 4:37 left in the quarter, and they scored to go up by 3, 26–23.

Narducci got the fans whooping when his ball swished in for 3 behind the arc to tie it at 26 with 4:04 on the clock, but that elation quickly faded when the Panthers went back up by 2 on a very easy basket. To make matters worse, the Dawgs, who are normally very efficient at handling and passing the ball, turned it over on yet another bad pass, but at least this time, it did not result in a basket by Middle Township. Haddonfield got two shots off its next possession but did not score. Roddy picked off the ball before the Panthers could set up a play, but for naught. And so this non-scoring went on for a few more trips up and down the court for both teams. I did not record the time, probably because I was too busy yelling, when McFillin launched a 3 that put the Dawgs up 29–28, but I did note that Middle Township lost the ball out of bounds with 4 seconds left, and the Dawgs did not get their last shot to go in. So as the fourth quarter started, instead of fading away, the underdawgs were up by 1 …

Haddonfield had possession to start the last quarter of regulation but could not score. Middle Township at the other end got a 3 to swing the lead back their way, 31–29, with 6:48 on the clock. A travel was called on Haddonfield, and the Dawgs then picked up two quick fouls. The second sent the Panthers to the line, where both foul shots were made. Now the Panthers’ lead was back to 4, 33–29, with 6:03 left in the fourth, and I think Haddonfield fans were wondering if they were going to start to pull away. A Narducci 3 was a firm reply that no, the Dawgs were not going to give up, and were back to within 1, 33–34.

Middle Township called a timeout with 4:52 on the clock and when play resumed, proceeded to bounce, bounce, bounce the ball with no real attempt to score for more than 2 minutes. That plan backfired when they were called for a walk with 2:48 left in the quarter. Another timeout was called, I believe this time by Haddonfield, even though I didn’t note it on my pad, at the 2:34 mark. I have been trying to decipher what I scribbled down next. All I can figure out is that it involved Rohlfing and ended with him driving into the paint for 2 to put the Dawgs on top by 1, 34–33.

At the Middle Township end, the Panthers got that basket back and were fouled in the process. Their foul shot gave them a 2-point, 36–34, edge with 2:08 on the scoreboard. It was nail-biting time as the Dawgs took the ball down to their end of the court. Narducci, not surprisingly, took the ball to drive in and was fouled. He stepped to the line with 1:37 to go and the season on the line. His first shot hit nothing but net. His second shot, equally perfect, tied the game at 36.

After a timeout, Middle Township went back into stall-ball mode and would not shoot. It was maddening. Roddy made a smart foul with 9.2 on the clock just as the Panthers were about to make a move, which broke up whatever play was in the works. Instead, the Panthers sent up an airball, and with about 2 seconds on the clock, the Dawgs flailed a shot off that missed the mark as the fourth quarter buzzer went off. Still tied at 36, the game was about to go into a 4-minute overtime, and Dawg fans were going nuts.

I wish this recap would end in a winning way for Haddonfield. But in OT, the Dawgs were held to a pair of foul shots by Rohlfing. While they did miss some shots that were a bit forced as OT ticked down, they were also limited by the times actually touched the ball, as Middle Township slowed the pace down again. With about 1:30 left in the game, after a near steal by Roddy when the ball also almost went out of bounds, the Panthers somehow recovered and an off-balance shot dropped in for a 3.

After Middle Township made 2 shots from the foul line that put them in front 46–38, Paul Wiedeman called a timeout so he could take his seniors out of the game as a final tribute to them as their season and careers came to an end. It was hard to watch them, looking a little shell-shocked, walk off the court and try to console each other, but at the same time, I wouldn’t have expected anything less from this group of seniors who had played together, grown together, and become good friends together. And while their playing days together may be over, I predict that the bond that they established as middle schoolers will remain unbroken no matter where life leads them.

Quarter scores:

1st: Haddonfield 10, Middle Township 7

2nd: Haddonfield 8, Middle Township 15

Halftime: Haddonfield 18, Middle Township 20

3rd: Haddonfield 11, Middle Township 6

4th: Haddonfield 7, Middle Township 8

OT: Haddonfield 2, Middle Township 8

Final, Haddonfield 38, Middle Township 46

Player scores:

Sam Narducci 17

Phil McFillin 12

Nate Rohlfing 7

Patrick Ryan 2

On the Upside

I wanted to end this piece in an upbeat way by giving a shout out to the HYBA (Haddonfield Youth Basketball Association) Girls Travel Team 7A. You may have heard about the incredible finish to their semifinal game on Sunday, 2/25, against Washington Township. The teams were tied in overtime with about 4 seconds to go when Sara Guveiyian stole the ball under the Washington Township basket and somewhere between the top of the 3-point arc and the midcourt line, let go a shot that soared over the court and into the net. (If you somehow missed seeing a video of this extraordinary feat on social media or the local news, here is my favorite replay of it: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C3-S6g1phNj/?fbclid=IwAR39kt_pKDghSMNHvXnB2ceCM3rKf9xmj1t-SxP5rCRQ0yfZb1iv0AKlZyo.) This Sunday, the Haddonfield Girls 7A traveled to Lenape High School to take on the Mt. Laurel girls, who Haddonfield had beaten twice already during the regular season. It’s tough to beat a team, at any level, three times in a row. And for a while, it looked like this was going to be the case. The 7A girls were down by 4 at the half. The second half seesawed back and forth, but Mt. Laurel seemed to be pulling away in the fourth. However, the 7A Haddonfield girls played really tough defense and forced turnovers that got them back in the game, as did some big-time foul shots. Still, Mt. Laurel had possession of the ball with the game tied at 22 with about 6 seconds to go. Sara stole the ball again, but this time, she passed it to Lane Barnes, whose shot went up and in, putting the Dawgs on top 24–22. Mt. Laurel had no timeouts and could not get a shot off. This was the third straight championship for the 7A Haddonfield girls. They played hard, never gave up, and stayed cool at the end of the game. Although she didn’t have the winning shot, Sara finished with four 3’s and 14 points. Congratulations to the team and their coaches for a stellar year and claiming the title once again!

One Last Article

The Haddonfield boys basketball team may not have won the South Jersey Group 2 title (and neither did Middle Township, who was, as expected, blown away by Camden two nights after their escape from Haddonfield’s clutches), but they had a tremendous year, finishing with a record of 27–3. That seems more than worthy of a final article that will take a look at some of their biggest wins and highlight as well individual player accomplishments.

HMHS Boys Basketball: NJISAA Group 2 playoffs: Round 1

By Lauree Padgett / Exclusive to Haddonfield[dot]Today

Dawgs Hang on to Clip Hawks

Manchester Township at Haddonfield: February 21, 2024

Not that readers of my wrap-ups cling on every word I write, but you may recall that in my NJISAA preview last week, I said that the 10-15 overall record of Haddonfield’s first opponent, the Hawks of Manchester Township, should not make Dawg fans overconfident of the game’s outcome. That ended up being one of my more accurate predictions for the season thus far. Although the Dawgs prevailed, it by no means proved to be an easy W.

The game started out as well as possible. Phil McFillin swooshed in a 3 pointer and got fouled in the process. His foul shot put the Dawgs in front 4–0 with only 4 seconds gone in the game. That was quicky followed by a 2 from the Hawks. Nate Rohlfing got fouled in the paint and made 1–2 from the line with 6:29 on the clock. After getting surrounded by three Dawgs, the Hawks’ ball carrier committed a travel during Manchester Township’s next possession. The Dawgs took full advantage of the turnover as Sam Narducci knocked down a 3, putting the Dawgs up by 6, 8–2.

At the other end, Rohlfing’s defensive rebound set up Narducci’s second trey in less than a minute, and in less than 2 minutes, the Dawgs had jumped out to a 11–2 edge. Patrick Ryan pulled down his first defensive board of the game, and the Hawgs picked up their third foul of the quarter. Haddonfield put up four shot attempts and none dropped, however, and after a pickoff by Ryan, the Dawgs missed another shot, before the Hawks ended their 3-minute drought with another 2.

In the Dawgs’ next possession, somehow a very open Ryan was missed under the basket. Instead, Daire Roddy got fouled attempting to score. He made the first foul shot but not the second, which Rohlfing rebounded. The Dawgs missed two more scoring chances, but the Hawks were robbed of their next attempt by Roddy’s steal. While the Dawgs’ defense was looking solid, the offense was having trouble getting the ball in the net, and again failed two times to score this time down the floor. Finally after a defensive rebound by Rohlfing, Narducci got the ball and went cross court and up and in to make it 14–4, Haddonfield with 1:35 left in the quarter. The last points of the quarter came on foul shots. Manchester Township made 1–2 at the 1:29 mark, and Narducci dropped in both shots with 3.7 on the clock. As the horn sounded, the Dawgs were on top by double digits, 16­­–5.

The Hawks got to the foul line after the Dawgs did not score when they inbounded the ball to start the second quarter. Not only were both foul shots good, the Hawks then got the next two field goals, and with 6:09 left in the half, the Dawgs’ 11-point lead had been whittled down to 5, 16–11. Matt Morris’ ball on a hard drive in the paint did everything but drop in, but after Narducci secured the defensive board under the Hawks’ basket, Morris’ next shot from behind the arc hit nothing but net, pushing the Dawgs’ lead to 8, 19–11.

Rohlfing pulled down another defensive board and then brought down the house at the other end, slamming the ball through the basket off a feed from Mike Douglas. That gave the Dawgs’ back their double-digit lead, but not for long, as the Hawks got a 2 under their basket, although it was not quite as exciting. The Dawgs did not score, the Hawks did, and with 2:41 on the clock, they were back to within 6, 21–16. The Dawgs lost the ball on a bad pass (this has been an uncharacteristic problem the past few games, and if the Dawgs hope to advance further into the playoffs, they will need to cut down on this type of turnover), but Narducci’s steal set up a Morris drive for 2 in the paint. Morris nearly picked off the ball, but instead, Manchester Township hit a 3 from way out, and with 1:33 on the clock, they were within 5, 23–18.

The Dawgs picked up a few fouls and then got called for a held ball with 42.3 remaining in the half. The Hawks’ bucket made it a 3-point game, but after running down the clock under their basket, the Dawgs got the last 2 ahead of the buzzer on a pass from Roddy to Ryan. Although the Dawgs left the court up by 5, 25­­–20, the Hawks had outscored them in the second 8 minutes by 6, 15–9. How would the Dawgs respond in the final two quarters?

Offensively, the Dawgs wouldn’t light up the scoreboard in the third or fourth quarters, but their defense did keep the Hawks at bey. In the third, the Dawgs didn’t score off the inbound, but the Hawks’ quick response also failed. Rohlfing got the defensive board and Roddy drove in for a basket to make it 27–20, Dawgs. All that happened in the first 7 seconds! Two-plus minutes would go by before there was another basket. With 3:41 on the clock Dawg coach Paul Wiedeman called a 30-second timeout. The Lady Dawgs, who had been in the stands, began to make their way down to the girls’ locker room. That pause in action was all our clever announcer and music man Mark Hershberger needed to start playing “The Lion Sleeps Tonight,” a sly reference to the fact that the girls’ first-round opponent would be their Colonial rivals, the Gloucester City Lions. (Hershberger’s song selection foreshadowed the girls’ 61–21 pounding of the Lions later that night.)

But back to the boys’ game. After the quick timeout, the Dawgs came back on the court and set up another slam by Rohlfing, this one coming off a dish by Roddy. That upped the Dawgs’ lead to 9, 29–20, with 3:31 on the clock. Almost 60 more seconds would tick off the clock before another basket, this one by the Hawks, who also got a foul shot opportunity and made it. Rohlfing and Roddy combined again for another Rohlfing basket, and he also stepped to the foul line. His shot kept it a 9-point, 32–23, Haddonfield advantage. After a pilfer by McFillin, Narducci was fouled in the act of shooting. His first shot missed, but his second one dropped in with 1:03 on the clock and the Dawgs back to a 10-point edge.

The Hawks were trying to run down the clock to take the last shot, by Roddy foiled that plan, and fed the ball to Narducci, whose basket made it 35–23 with 13 seconds left. The Hawks last-second attempt at a 3 hit the backboard and dropped in, so as the buzzer sounded, Manchester Township had cut its deficit down to single digits and were trailing by 9, 35–26.

In the fourth quarter, the Dawgs maintained a safe lead throughout, so their fans weren’t holding their breaths after each possession. It helped that Haddonfield actually was able to score after inbounding the ball to start the quarter. It was off a pass from Ryan to Rohlfing and once again gave the Dawgs a double-digit, 37–26, lead. (While it was good to see Rohlfing strong under the basket throughout the game, Ryan needs to be getting in the paint and scoring, not just passing and rebounding, as the South Jersey playoffs progress.) After the Hawks scored, Rohlfing scored again, keeping the Dawgs lead at 11, 39-28, with 6:48 on the clock.

After a sideline scuffle a few plays later that gave the Hawks the ball, a Dawg foul sent them to the foul line. Both shots were good, making it 39–30, Dawgs.  Rohlfing was fouled at the Dawgs’ end. He made 1–2 at the 5:15 mark. In the next 50 seconds, the Dawg got fouled, lost a pass, got it back, missed a shot, but the ball went out of bounds off Manchester Township. Rohlfing got his last basket of the game off the inbounds, and with 4:15 left in the game, the Dawgs had their biggest lead, 12 points, up 42–30.

A drive by Roddy a few plays later made it 44–30. The Hawks got those 2 points back from the foul line, but were still down by 12, 44–32, with 3 minutes and change left in the game. Neither team would score for a good chunk of those 3 minutes until the Hawks got to the foul line with 33.9 seconds on the clock. One foul shot went in, making it 44–33, and that would be the final score. Nate Rohlfing finished with 15 and Sam Narducci added 13.

Quarter scores:

1st: Haddonfield 16, Manchester Township 5

2nd: Haddonfield 9, Manchester Township 16

Halftime: Haddonfield 25, Manchester Township 20

3rd: Haddonfield 10, Manchester Township 6

4th: Haddonfield 9, Manchester Township 7

Final score: Haddonfield 44, Manchester Township 33

South Jersey Group 2, Round 2 Monday, 2/26

The Dawgs will face an even tougher opponent in today’s round 2 game. The Tigers of Lower Cape May, in the United division of the Cape Atlantic Conference, sport a 21–6 overall record and are 12–0 in their division. They have won three out of their last five games compared to the Dawgs, who have gone 4–1. It should be another “paw” biter!

Fans who are planning to attend the game, take note: Although there were tickets still available at the door for last Wednesday’s contest, you might want to “play” it safe and order them in advance. (If not, make sure your cellphone has the capacity to order them online when you get to the Haddons Pavilion.) Here is the overall ticketing link: https://haddonfieldathletics.org/main/ticketing. You will see options to buy tickets for both the boy’s 5 p.m. game and the 7 p.m. girls game versus Haddon Township. (It is rumored that this may be Hawk coach Tom Mulligan’s last game. If so, it will be against an opposing coach who just happens to be married to his assistant coach and brother!)

HMHS Boys Basketball: Onward!

By Lauree Padgett / Exclusive to Haddonfield[dot]Today

Camden County Tournament Rounds 3 and 4

To mix my sports metaphors again, playing in the third and fourth rounds of the Camden County tournament resulted in a split decision for the Haddonfield boys basketball team last week. Both games, one versus Cherry Hill West, the other a rematch against Camden Catholic, were close, competitive matches, with the victor only pulling away in the final minutes of each contest. The upside was that two players whose statuses had been in question for the Dawgs, seniors Sam Narducci and Nate Rohlfing, contributed significant minutes out of a combined eight quarters of action. The downside was that the intense schedule of three, and sometimes four, games per week with starters not always in the lineup or able to play full throttle, seemed to catch up with the team in their second bout versus the  Irish.

Cherry Hill West vs. Haddonfield: February 12, 2024, at Eastern Regional High School

After taking care of the Winslow Eagles from the Patriot division of the Olympic conference rather easily with a 67–31 win in round one of the Camden County Tournament the previous week, the Dawgs would go up against another Patriot team, the Lions of Cherry Hill West. The Lions would give the Dawgs one of their toughest battles of the season from end to end.

Off the tip-off, the Lions got the basket but did not score. Patrick Ryan pulled down the defensive board, and Dawgs would get their first bucket off a feed from Phil McFillin to Nate Rohlfing that took its sweet time rolling off the rim into the basket. It took the Lions three tries (and two offensive boards) to tie it at 2 all with 6:48 on the clock. Neither team would score for almost 2 minutes until McFillin dropped in a 3 to make it 5–2, Dawgs, at the 4:52 mark. The Lions answered with a 3 to even it at 5 all and would go ahead by 2 after taking advantage of a turnover by Haddonfield.

Daire Roddy’s drive in the paint evened the score again, and after Ryan helped corral a loose ball, McFillin went up and in to put the Dawgs in front by 2, 9–7, with 2:44 left in the first. Another mini scoring draught ensued, and this time Cherry Hill West would break it with a 3 to retake the lead by 1, 10–9, with 1:27 to go. A Rohlfing-to-Narducci pass set Narducci up for a 3. This seemed a positive sign that Narducci was at close to full power after a reinjured ankle had kept him on the bench for the Dawgs’ previous three games. Now it was 12–10, Dawgs, with :49 on the clock. The Lions made 1–2 from the line, but Rohlfing’s 2 would finish out the quarter’s scoring and put the Dawgs ahead by 3, 14–11 going into the second.  

Haddonfield inbounded but failed to score, and at the other end, the Lions hit a 3 to bring the game to yet another tie, 14 all, with about 30 seconds having ticked off the clock. After a shooting attempt that left Roddy on the floor (with no foul called), Rohlfing made a huge block—Rohlfing, who had been averaging about 2.1 blocks per game would put on a defensive display and end up with 11 total—but a play later, a Haddonfield foul sent Cherry Hill West to the line, making 1–2. A jumper by Narducci switched the l-point lead back to the Dawgs’ favor. A block by Rohlfing, a defensive board by Ryan, and then an offensive board by Matt Morris set up a Mike Douglas-to-Ryan score, making it 18–15, Dawgs, with just under 6 minutes until the half.

The Lions responded with a 2, keeping it a 1-point game. The Dawgs had two scoring attempts that did not go in, Ryan stole the ball, but the Dawgs again could not get the ball in the net. Good “D” by the Dawgs ended with a Rohlfing block and saw the ball go out of bounds off the Lions. Still, the Dawgs’ shots were not dropping, but a pickoff by Narducci kept the Lions from going ahead. Finally, Douglas drove into the paint, scored, and was fouled in the process. His foul shot went in, and with 4:17 on the clock, the Dawgs were up by 4, 21–17.

More pressure defense by the Dawgs produced a backcourt violation by the Lions, but a bad pass gave the Lions back the ball. Rohlfing blocked a shot, the Lions got called for a foul, and the Dawgs were moving the ball, looking for an opening. From waaaay out, Narducci found it and nailed a 3, giving the Dawgs’ a 7-point, 24–17, lead with 2:49 to go until the half. After Douglas blocked a shot, Cherry Hill West called a timeout. The Lions would get a trip to the foul line after Rohlfing was assessed a foul from what looked like a clean block and would hit 1–2, making it a 6-point, 24–18, game with about 2:30 left on the clock.

The Dawgs lost the ball again on bad passing—a portend of what was to come two days later with more deleterious overall results—Douglas picked up his second block, but the ball went out of bounds off Haddonfield. Rohlfing’s defense led to a rebound by Douglas and somehow even though he was way off-balance, Narducci got the ball to go in the net, giving the Dawgs’ their biggest lead, 8 points, with about 90 seconds until the half.

A foul sent the Lions to line yet again, but this time, both shots went in, making it 26–20, Haddonfield. At the other end, Zack Langan went down but no foul was called (this would also be part of the story in Haddonfield’s game against Camden Catholic). When the Dawgs got the ball back with 16.8 on the clock, the plan seemed to be to hold the ball until the last shot, but a misfired pass enabled Cherry Hill West to get the last basket of the half, and when the teams left the court, the Dawgs were only up by 4, 26–22.

Cherry Hill West had the inbounds to start the second half and wasted no time in scoring, but just as quickly, the Dawgs scored on a Roddy-to-Rohlfing setup. However, the Lions would get back to within 2, 28–26 at the 7:26 mark. A jumper by Roddy pushed the lead back to 4, 30–26, but a 3 by the Lions at the other end tightened it to 30–29, Dawgs, with 5:42 on the clock A hard drive in the lane by Rohlfing gave the Dawgs some breathing room, and his blocked shot gave the Dawgs back the ball, which McFillin sailed into the net behind the 3-point arc, making it 35–29 with 4:29 to go in the third.

Back-to-back baskets by the Lions, with the second basket including a made shot from the line, deflated the cushion down to 1 point, 35–34. After the Dawgs couldn’t connect ball to net, the Lions had the chance to go ahead, but a block by Rohlfing prevented that. The Lions picked the ball off, but also did not score. At the Dawgs’ end, Narducci found a wide open McFillin, who hit a 3 and was fouled. Although his foul shot did not go in, it still meant that the Dawgs were up by 4, 38–34, with 3:02 on the clock.

The Lions were not going away, however, and after both teams did not score for a few possessions, made 2 from the foul line to get back to within 2, 38–36, with 1:29 to go in the quarter. The Dawgs turned the ball over, but the Lions also did not score. This time, the Dawgs made a shot but it did not go in. With 8.1 on the clock Cherry Hill West was called for an offensive foul, giving the Dawgs the last possession of the quarter, but their shot did not go in. So, with 8 minutes left in the game, the Dawgs were only up by 2.

Haddonfield inbounded the ball to start the fourth, but did not come away with a basket. Cherry Hill West was also unsuccessful. Douglas, who has shown a lot of poise when he comes into games, got a 2 on a jumper, and after Rohlfing blocked another shot and secured the rebound, scored at the other end. In a blink, the Dawgs got the ball back, and Rohlfing scored again. With 6:26 left in the game, the Dawgs had gone back up by 6, 42–36.

That lead went back down to 4 on a basket by the Lions. Douglas got fouled and made his first but not second shot, so with 5:56 remaining, the Dawgs were ahead by 5, 43–38. The Dawgs didn’t score, the Lions did, being fouled in the process. The foul shot did not go in, but the Lions got the rebound and the basket, and suddenly, it was only a 1-point Dawg advantage, 43–42, with 5:26 on the clock. Rohlfing got fouled, missed the first shot, but made the second. At the other end, the Dawgs fouled off a 3-point attempt, which meant the Lions had three chances at the line. Although the first shot missed, the second two went in, and with 4:55 left in the game, it was knotted at 44.

A nice setup in which Rohlfing passed the ball to Ryan broke the tie, and with the Dawgs up a basket, 46–44, Haddonfield called a timeout. A non-shooting foul by Haddonfield gave Cherry Hill West another scoring opportunity, but Rohlfing took care of that with a block, and down at the Dawgs’ basket, Ryan fed Narducci the ball, and he knocked down a 3. With 3:03 left in the game, the Dawgs had gotten back to a 5-point, 49–44, advantage. The Lions got 2 of those points back their next possession, and with 2:25 to go and a 3-point lead, Haddonfield called another timeout.

Rohlfing got another feed from Ryan, missed the shot, but got his own rebound and scored, making it 51–46, Haddonfield. Narducci grabbed a defensive board under the Lion basket, and then set McFillin up for a 3, which gave the Dawgs an 8-point, 54–46 lead with only 1:31 left in the game. Cherry Hill West got 2 from the foul line, cutting that down to 54–48, but Haddonfield got the ball to Narducci, who was wide open under the Dawgs basket to make it an 8–point lead again, 56–48, with 1:02 on the clock. The last point for either team would come from the line after Morris was fouled and made 1–2. Narducci would get the last rebound of the game and bounce down the clock. When it hit 0:00, the Dawgs had prevailed 57–48, and Dawg fans heaved a collective sigh of relief. Sam Narducci led the Dawgs with 15, and McFillin added 14. In addition to his 11 blocks, Rohlfing scored 13.

Quarter scores:

1st: Haddonfield 14, Cherry Hill West 11

2nd: Haddonfield 12, Cherry Hill West 11

Halftime: Haddonfield 26, Cherry Hill West 22

3rd: Haddonfield 12, Cherry Hill West 14

4th: Haddonfield 19, Cherry Hill West 12

Player scores:

Sam Narducci 15

Phil McFillin 14

Nate Rohlfing 13

Mike Douglas 6

Patrick Ryan 4

Daire Roddy 4

Matt Morris 1

Record-Breaking Season for DePersia

I had to share this amazing stat with Dawg fans. This past Saturday, the men’s basketball game between the Le Moyne University Dolphins and the Stonehill Skyhawks was televised on the YES network, which is part of my cable sports package. I was quite excited to watch these two Division 1 teams from the NEC (Northeast Conference) because it meant I could root for my favorite Dolphin, Mike DePersia, who was a huge part of Haddonfield’s back-to-back state championships in 2018 and 2019. (In case you were wondering, because COVID-19 hit during Mike’s freshman year at IUPUI, he had 2 years of eligibility remaining when he enrolled at grad school at Le Moyne in 2022, and he was able to keep playing hoops.) Throughout the broadcast, the announcers were talking about Mike’s ball-handling skills and how he was able to take care of the basketball while setting up his teammates to score.. During one such rave, they said Mike was “shattering” the NEC’s all-time assist-to-turnover ratio. In fact, as they explained, no one in the history of the conference had come close to what he has been averaging this season: a 3.65 ratio. That means as of that game, he had only committed 23 turnovers, which translates into about one per game, while dishing out 73 assists. The previous record was a 2.95 assist-to-turnover ratio. Whoop, whoop, Mikey!!

Camden Catholic vs. Haddonfield: February 14, 2024, at Camden Eastside

Haddonfield’s fourth-round opponent in the Camden County Tournament would be a familiar one from early on in the season: Camden Catholic The two teams had met in the Dawgs’ second game of the season back on December 16 as part of the Jimmy V Classic at Cherokee High School. The Dawgs had led after every quarter and held off the Irish to win by 6, 48–42. Dawg fans were hoping for a similar outcome.

And at the outset, that prospect was looking promising. The Dawgs rattled off the first 6 points of the game. Daire Roddy got the offense going, then Nate Rohlfing got the next two baskets, the first off an offensive rebound and the second off a feed by Roddy. With about 90 seconds gone, the Dawgs were up 6–0. Camden Catholic’s first point came from the foul line, and a few plays later, Roddy added a pair from the line, making it 8–1, Haddonfield with 3:19 left in the game.

Before Dawg fans could start feeling too cocky, the Irish hit a 3 to make it 8–4, but after a timeout, Phil McFillin hit the first of his treys and put the Dawgs back up by 7, 11–4 with 2:07 on the clock. The Irish got 2 back before Narducci’s jumper returned the Dawgs’ advantage to 7 points, 13–6, with 1:33 to go. The Dawgs had a few more chances to score in the remaining 90 seconds of the quarter, but sloppy play, which would plague them the whole game, kept them at 13 and enabled the Irish to get an easy bucket right ahead of the buzzer.

Haddonfield inbounded to start the second quarter up by 5, 13–8. They did not score, but a foul by Camden Catholic gave the Dawgs back the ball. This time, Rohlfing was fouled as he went up and in, and his shot from the line gave the Dawgs an 8-point, 16–8, advantage with less than a minute off the clock. Unfortunately, the Dawgs would only get 2 more points, again from Rohlfing on the foul line, the rest of the quarter. His shots with 2:31 remaining in the half temporarily put the Dawgs back in front 18–17. The Irish regained the lead a few possessions later from a 3, with 1:44 on the clock. Neither team could score after that, and when the halftime horn sounded, the Dawgs were trailing by 2, 18–20.

Certainly a 2-point deficit did not seem insurmountable as the third period began. When McFillin got the first basket of the second half to tie the game at 20, I think the Dawg fans who had made the 4 p.m. game at Camden Eastside (formerly Woodrow Wilson) thought, “OK, here we go.” But Camden Catholic would score the next two baskets to push their lead to 4, 24–20, at the 5:35 mark. A Ryan-to-Narducci pass made it a 2-point game with 4:55 left in the quarter. The Dawgs lost the ball on a travel, but after holding the Irish scoreless their next possession, failed to score again. An offensive board gave Camden Catholic another chance to score and they knocked down a 3 to go up by 5, their biggest lead of the game, 27–22, with 3:05 on the clock. Mike Douglas drove in the paint for a much-needed Dawg basket with 59 seconds left in the quarter. Camden Catholic then got fouled with 49 seconds to go. The two shots from the line were good, putting the Irish up by 5 once more, 29–24, which is how the quarter ended.

Douglas got the Dawgs’ first bucket of the 4th, but Camden Catholic answered with a 2 to keep their lead at 5, 31–26. Matt Morris made it 28–31 with 6:52 on the clock. The Irish would score the next 4 points, two from the line and a 2 from the field, and at the 5:55 mark, the Dawgs were behind by 7, 28–35. The two teams traded buckets twice, with Douglas and Narducci scoring for the Dawgs, but the second score by Camden Catholic earned them a trip to the line. That made foul shot put the Irish up by 8, 40–32, with 4:23 to go in the game.

Although they were playing hard, the Dawgs just weren’t able to get the ball in the basket. The effort was there, but fatigue was taking its toll, especially on the offensive end. Sure shooters were missing the mark. Narducci did get a ball to drop with 4:02 left, getting the Dawgs to within 6, 34–40, but the Irish got a point back from the line their next possession. Narducci attempted to score again but was knocked to the ground. When no foul was called, I joined the Dawg faithful in booing the fact that all three refs failed to see that Narducci didn’t fall down on his own. This might be a good time to note that many Dawgs fans were gripping rather loudly throughout the game about the fact that the three-ref team was calling fouls left, right, and center on the Dawgs but not making the same type of calls against the Irish. I would say they had some cause for complaint, but in the end, the Dawgs were hurt more by their own inability to put the ball in the net than they were by foul calls.

Of course, to add insult to (hopefully not) injury, after the no call on Narducci, the Irish scored and got a trip to the foul line, giving them a 3-point play that also gave Camden Catholic its first double-digit lead, 44–34, with 2:19 remaining in the game. A Dawg turnover on a travel call led to another basket by the Irish, and with less than 2 minutes to go, the Dawgs were now down by 12, 34–46. A 3 by McFillin got the Dawg fans cheering, and after 2 by Camden Catholic, McFillin launched another 3. (He would be the only Dawg to score behind the arc this game, making four treys.) That 3 got the Dawgs to within 8, but there were only 50 seconds left on the clock. After the teams went 1–2 from the line (Narducci got the basket for Haddonfield), McFillin hit his third 3 in about 70 seconds. The Dawgs were now down 5, 44–49, but time was not on their side. The scoring ending with Camden Catholic making 2 from the line. When the buzzer sounded, the Dawgs had been defeated for only the second time in 27 games, losing by 7, 44–51.

Quarter scores:

1st: Haddonfield 13, Camden Catholic 8

2nd: Haddonfield 5, Camden Catholic 12

Halftime: Haddonfield 18, Camden Catholic 20

3rd: Haddonfield 6, Camden Catholic 9

4th: Haddonfield 20, Camden Catholic 22

Final: Haddonfield 44, Camden Catholic 51

Player scores:

Phil McFillin 14

Sam Narducci 9

Nate Rohlfing

Mike Douglas 6

Daire Roddy 4

Matt Morris 2

Patrick Ryan 2

NJISAA Tournament

The Dawgs, seeded fourth behind Middle Township, Camden, and Cinnaminson in that order, will take to the court this Wednesday night in a 5 p.m. home game that starts the South Jersey Group 2 playoffs. Their opponent will be Manchester Township, seeded 13, with an overall record of 10–15. Those in the know, however, say the Hawks will be a tougher opponent than their record indicates. Hopefully, with 7 days between games, the Dawgs will have had time to recuperate from nagging injuries and full up their tank again. After the boys game, stay on to root for the Lady Dawgs, who will be playing a Colonial Conference opponent, the Gloucester City Lions, at 7 p.m.

Let’s go DAWGS!            

HMHS Boys Basketball: Senior Dawgs: The Elite 8

By Lauree Padgett / Exclusive to Haddonfield[dot]Today

When trying to come up with a term to describe the senior Dawgs—Mike Feinstein, Zach Langan, Phil McFillin, Matt Morris, Sam Narducci, Daire Roddy, Nate Rohlfing, and Patrick Ryan—I wanted something to reflect both their number and their value. It took some time and some pondering, but finally “the Elite Eight” came into my head. This is what the teams from the NCAA basketball tournament are called that have made it through the earlier rounds to get to the quarter-finals. These teams are the cream of the crop. For many reasons, several which I’ll mention, this nomenclature seemed to fit.

I had the fun job of interviewing these eight young men during halftime of the JV’s game versus Paulsboro on 2/6. When I reached out to their coach Paul Wiedeman about the prospect, he quickly replied that he would set it up for us to meet in the cafeteria. As I saw the boys, who had been sitting up in the bleachers behind the Haddonfield bench, start to head down and out, I did the same. We met up a few minutes later and gathered around a big round table. In years’ past, I had the chance to get to interact with the players a bit, greeting and congratulating them on the court after games, so by the end of a season,  we knew each other a little. COVID, as it did for many things, changed all that, and those on-court meetups stopped. That meant this was literally the first time I had talked to any of them. It seemed fair that if they were going to share some info about themselves and each other, I should give them a bit of my backstory. I told them that I’d been coming to games since I was about 6 and that I had started covering the games, first for local town paper, The Haddon Gazette, which morphed into The Suburban, By the time the name changed again (to what I can’t recall),  I was back to just being a fan in the stands. During the mid-2000’s, while Haddonfield was winning back-to-back-to-back Group 2 state titles, David Hunter, publisher of What’s on in Haddonfield, had me write up some NJISAA tournament games,and then I migrated to Haddonfield Online. In those days, I often came home from games, wrote up the summary, and it was posted the next morning. Now, as you know if you are reading this, I do a mostly weekly recap for Haddonfield Today.

I told the seniors that I’d been to every state final game since 1973 and told them a funny story (well, the story itself isn’t funny, as it still sticks in my crawl 35 years later) about how Haddonfield had gone 31–0 en route to the state title Paul Wiedeman’s senior year only to lose in the first round of the inaugural Tournament of Champions game due to outrageous (I told you I’m still bitter) refereeing in the final minutes. They listened and responded appropriately to the parts about a technical and an offensive charge, both being called against Haddonfield, that cost us the game. Then I said, “Enough about me.”

All eight seniors have been playing together since their days in the HBYA (Haddonfield Youth Basketball Association), which starts in middle school, i.e., 6th grade. I first asked if that seemed like 7 years ago or not. Just like it would take them a while to warm up on the court a little while later, it took a few minutes for them to give me more some nods and smiles. As he often does on the court, Daire got the ball rolling, so to speak, acknowledging how cool it was that they had all stuck with the game and were still playing together as seniors.

My next question got them going and really illustrated how comfortable they are with each other on and off the court. I wanted them to describe their teammates with a word or phrase, and the answers I got made us all laugh, as often the terms they gave me could have been taken an entirely different way and resulted in me writing a different kind of story that could have piqued the interest of the Haddonfield PD.

For example, Matt was called “shifty” and “elusive,” as well as “goofy and fun.” What his friends meant by the first two words was that Matt has the ability to change direction on a dime and avoid the opposition so he can drive in, pass the ball, or, as he did a few games later, stop short and drop in a 3. Nate labeled many of his teammates “shooters,” which is quite true. (Looking at stats in the 2/11 edition of NJ.com, which reflected games up through 2/8, Haddonfield has three players, with Sam number 1 despite all his missed games, in the top 10 for 3’s made. Together, their numbers add up to more than 160. Daire, Zach, Nate, and Mike have also hit their share of 3’s during the season.)

As for Nate, he got called “tall,” “strong,” “beast,” and “grizzly.” But my favorite word was given by Zach, who used his arms to emphasis what he meant by “Loooong.” At 6-8, Nate has quite a wingspan, which explains why he’s leading the Colonial Conference in blocked shots, averaging just under 2 per game. He is one of several Dawgs that have missed some games due to injury, and he confirmed that while he felt a bit out of shape his first few games, he is “back.” His ”strong” showing in the paint later that night echoed that statement.

While his teammates have all taken turns starting this year, I told Mike that I suspected he might love basketball more than anyone for sticking with basketball even though he does not get as much playing time. He gave me a big smile and said it is “always fun” to be a part of the team with his buddies. And when one of the adjectives shared for him was “underrated,” all seven of his mates nodded vigorously that this was an understatement. Their mutual appreciation of and respect for Mike came out during that night’s game, when they made sure everyone in the stands knew what he could do with a ball in his hand. Whenever he was on the court, they fed him so he could shoot. Thanks to their unselfishness, Mike finished with 14 points along with Nate.

Unselfishness is part of the Dawgs’ mantra, part of Coach Wiedeman’s core belief that every player wearing the Haddonfield uniform is part of the team, an important part. If you look at the Colonial Conference assists leaderboard, you wouldn’t likely be surprised that Daire is in the top spot. But proving how well they mesh on the court, several other Dawgs are in the top 20 for “dishes” per game. No one has to be, or seems to want to be, the “star.” Sam’s had a few monster games, but on any given night, three players will finish in double digits, usually only separated by a point or two.

“Unselfish” is also the word that when doled out for Daire, got his fellow senior Dawgs pounding the table in agreement. He was also called “talented” and “clutch.” “Clutch” was certainly the word to use when as a freshman and not the tallest Dawg on the court, Daire intercepted a pass with the Dawgs down 2 with about 2 seconds left in the game. Even then, he had the calmness on the court to plant his feet so he was centered before he let go a 3 that swooshed in and won the game (and an appearance on ESPN). I had noticed that in the past few weeks, Daire had started taking shots instead of just setting up his teammates to score. Was that intentional? Daire said that both he and Coach Wiedeman had decided he needed to take shots when open. It’s been paying off.

Patrick is “tough,” a “Dawg” (which I interpreted to mean he does not give up trying to get the rebound or score in the paint), and “physical.” But apparently this young man, who is among the Colonial Conference leaders in rebounds, also has a “silly” side. NJ.com’s Kevin Minnick has also ID’d Patrick as one of the conference’s unsung heroes. In the 2/11 online issue, he writes that Patrick “does all the dirty work and generally makes the paint his home.”

What did his teammates have to say about Zach? They cited his defense, that he has a hand in everything going on, and that he is “the glue guy.” He was also sidelined with a calf injury for quite a while, but also says he is feeling good again. His on-court play also indicates that this is the case.

Phil has a reputation among his teammates of being cool on the court, nonchalant, and sneaky. He is sneaky because you never know what he’s going to do: Drive hard into the paint to score, make a great pass, or knock down a 3 just when it’s needed. And no matter which of these actions he takes, he demeanor does remain cool as a cucumber. (Although, I have to admit that after sinking a few of his trademark corner 3’s, he was playing to the crowd—the Sterling student section specifically—a few nights later. But, to quote a line in the Drama Club’s upcoming spring musical, Chicago [check out the drama club page, https://hmhsdrama.com, for the March dates], “they had it coming.”)

Sam had been sitting directly across from me—with his right ankle and foot in a boot—during our interview session. He has very intense eyes. It’s probably one of many reasons the senior squad had a lot of superlatives for him: “basket,” “sniper,” “that guy,” “consistent,” and  “leader.” Even when he’s been sidelined, now for the second time, Sam still conveys that leadership quality. The good news is that the MRI he had the next day enabled Sam to get out of the boot. According to his dad Gary, Sam really wants to be on the court for today’s 4 p.m. Camden County tourney game versus Cherry Hill West, because he knows his teammates will need him. But whether he is on the court or not, Sam is a big part of the heart and soul of the team.

How, I asked, have all their years together, made them better on the court? Sam spoke up first, saying it has given them trust in each other. It’s also helped them almost instinctively know each other’s moves on the court. “We’re good friends on and off the court,” Phil added, saying that is why their chemistry is so natural. Daire expanded on Sam’s comment about trust, explaining that they can speak to each other freely during a game if a situation arises and no one gets upset. I saw a perfect example of this during the Winslow Township game on Saturday when Nate got called for a foul he didn’t commit and got a bit riled, since it was his fourth and he had to leave the game. A quick word from Daire and a pat on the back helped to calm Nate down.

Finally, I wanted to know what the Dawgs’ legacy means to them. Daire called it a “culture,” and being expected to win. Each team each year wants to keep that going. Phil also said there are different aspects. It’s about being on the court, but it’s also about what you do in the classroom and outside of it.

I can’t express how impressed I was by these eight young men. They were attentive, engaging, and polite, but above all, they were the definition of all the parts that make a team not just successful but special. As I made my way back to my seat in the stands, I was weaving in and out of a passel of current HYBA’ers. (It was also HYBA night at the high school.) While many of these boys may end up playing varsity hoops on this hallowed court and serve their team and school well, I suspect none will quite match the qualities exemplified by this elite group of eight.